strata_init

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool performs initialization affecting system state, and details behaviors of each mode (CBT safety, 48h cooling, multi-tenancy, AuditLog). However, it does not specify whether the tool is idempotent or if it overrides existing configuration.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no redundancy. First sentence states purpose, second provides mode options and key features. Every word is informative and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description covers the main purpose and mode distinction. Missing details include return value, side effects of repeated calls, and explanation of '48h cooling.' Adequate but leaves gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for all 7 parameters, each well-documented with types, enums, and defaults. The description adds minimal value beyond the schema, only reinforcing the mode choice. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states this is for first-time initialization with a dual-mode setup. The verb 'initialization' and resource 'dual-mode setup' are specific, and it distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'apply_memory_config' or 'memorize' by focusing on initial system configuration.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly marks this as 'First-time initialization,' indicating it should be used at the start. It guides the choice between 'personal' and 'company' modes, but does not specify when not to use it (e.g., after initialization) or mention alternatives among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.