Skip to main content
Glama
ShenghaiWang

mcpxcodebuild

by ShenghaiWang

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcpxcodebuild

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enable Claude Code, Cursor, or your favorite LLM to interact with Xcode, building your projects the same way you do, and seeing the same errors. Greatly increases productivity when working on iOS, iPadOS, macOS, visionOS, tvOS projects & Swift packages - or any time you might use Xcode.
      29
      441 PyPI
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to build, test, run, and manage Apple platform projects (iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, visionOS) directly through Xcode. Provides comprehensive control over Xcode projects, Swift packages, simulators, and development workflows without leaving your editor.
      5
      107 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides programmatic access to Xcode functionality, enabling AI assistants to create, build, test, and manage iOS/macOS projects directly.
      33
      7 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects AI coding clients like OpenCode, Codex, and Claude Code to Xcode and Apple development tools, enabling builds, tests, simulator and device management, profiling, asset handling, and more through natural language.
      146 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Bridges Xcode and Cursor to provide real-time access to build errors, warnings, and debug output from Xcode's DerivedData, enabling automated error analysis and fixes directly within Cursor.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: 'build' is for compiling the iOS Xcode workspace/project, while 'test' is for running tests on it. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these operations, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the desired action.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent, simple verb pattern ('build' and 'test') that directly describes the action. There are no deviations in naming style, and the pattern is predictable and readable across the tool set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin for its apparent scope of iOS Xcode development. Key operations like cleaning, archiving, or managing schemes are missing, which limits the agent's ability to handle common development workflows. The count is too low for a comprehensive tool surface in this domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is severely incomplete for iOS Xcode development. While build and test are core operations, there are significant gaps such as cleaning builds, archiving for distribution, or running specific test suites. This will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform standard development tasks beyond basic building and testing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive