A
licenseC
qualityD
maintenanceEnables building, running unit tests, and instrumented tests for Android projects through the MCP protocol.
3
MIT
Android Project MCP Server
by ShenghaiWang
Related Servers
Alternatives to Android Project MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceUnified MCP server for Android mobile development — combines project knowledge, Android CLI execution, live dependency versions, and agentic workflow tools for Claude Code.2418 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for local repository indexing and code understanding, enabling semantic search, AST analysis, dependency tracking, and symbol resolution.836 npmISC
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to build and test Xcode projects directly through a standardized interface, with capabilities for running tests, monitoring progress, and accessing logs in real-time.18188 npm53MIT
- FlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides persistent project context management for AI-assisted development, specifically designed for the Cline VSCode Extension.461-
- FlicenseCqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides tools and resources for Java CI/CD workflows and GitLab CI template management.1-
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The three tools have mostly distinct purposes: building, running tests, and running instrumented tests. However, 'test' and 'instrumentedTest' could be slightly ambiguous as instrumented tests are a subset of tests, but the descriptions clarify this distinction.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear, descriptive verbs ('build', 'test', 'instrumentedTest'). There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the set predictable and readable.
Tool Count3/5
With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for an Android project domain, which typically involves more operations like linting, debugging, or emulator management. While the tools cover core build and test workflows, the scope seems limited.
Completeness2/5
The tool surface is significantly incomplete for Android development. It lacks essential operations such as cleaning, linting, deploying, debugging, or managing dependencies, which are common in this domain and could lead to agent failures in broader tasks.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues