Skip to main content
Glama
Shaktisinhchavda

memory-mcp

by Shaktisinhchavda
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to memory-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • litecontext-cli

      Aries-0331
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that indexes Markdown/Obsidian folders and lets AI clients retrieve cited local context through MCP.
      MIT

    • moss-brain

      Naut1cal5
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides semantic memory with search, related-content traversal, and write-back capabilities, all powered by local embeddings of your notes, documents, and chat histories.
      3
      MIT

    • KnowledgeRail

      Deviank88
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server that turns project documentation and source code into durable, evidence-backed context for AI agents, with bounded retrieval and explicit gap reporting.
      8
      112 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • ragmark

      cdcoonce
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server for retrieval over markdown wikilink vaults, offering hybrid vector+lexical search, note reading, neighbor expansion, and recent activity tracking with fully local embeddings and no network egress.
      MIT

    • genmem

      helloSobuj
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that gives AI assistants long-term memory by storing, searching, and recalling notes as Markdown files on your machine.
      7 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: note creation/overwrite (save_note), appending (append_note), reading/list (read_notes), semantic search (semantic_search), index info (index_stats), and recent activity (get_recent_activity). No two tools overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (append_note, read_notes, save_note, get_recent_activity). However, 'index_stats' uses a noun_noun pattern instead of 'get_index_stats', and 'semantic_search' uses an adjective_noun pattern. Overall, naming is clear but not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server covers essential operations for a personal knowledge base—creating, reading, appending, searching, monitoring activity, and index statistics—without unnecessary bloat. The count is well-scoped for its purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides robust support for saving, reading, appending, searching, and monitoring notes. A notable gap is the lack of a delete/remove tool, which could hinder full lifecycle management. Otherwise, coverage is strong.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources