get_started_guide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It describes the tool as returning a JSON string with documentation but lacks details on side effects, rate limits, or auth requirements. The tool is clearly read-only, but this is assumed rather than stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is overly verbose with emojis, bullet points, and repetitive phrasing. It front-loads the purpose but then extends with excessive detail in a pushy tone. Every sentence does not earn its place; the guide's content could be summarized more efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, static documentation), the description covers the purpose, usage, and return format. The output schema exists, so return values are explained. It is complete enough for a guide tool with no complex behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. The description explicitly states 'None' and repeats this. The baseline for 0 parameters is 4, and the description adds value by explaining the return format, so a 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it is a 'Getting Started Guide' for the ask-ollama project, using specific verbs like 'provides', 'contains', and 'lists'. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like get_api_doc_section by offering a comprehensive overview rather than specific sections.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly recommends running this guide before other operations, stating 'Before proceeding with any operations, it's highly recommended to...' and lists steps for user interaction. It does not explicitly mention when not to use it or alternatives, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.