Skip to main content
Glama
Seyn-Labs

mcp-ai-fiskalizacija

by Seyn-Labs

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-ai-fiskalizacija

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Elorus invoicing and accounting platform, enabling AI assistants to create invoices, manage contacts, and query financial data through natural language.
      43
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for SuperFaktura invoicing system. Enables AI assistants to interact with SuperFaktura API for managing invoices, clients, and expenses.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Invoice Ninja v5 API. Enables AI assistants to manage clients, invoices, quotes, payments, and time tracking through natural language.
      32
      13 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Remote MCP server that lets any AI agent submit Saudi Arabia tax invoices to ZATCA (Fatoora Phase 2) — the Zakat, Tax and Customs Authority national e-invoicing gateway.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI agents issue Brazilian NFS-e service invoices via Focus NFe, with tools for creating, querying, and canceling invoices.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes Brazilian tax infrastructure as tools, resources, and prompts, enabling AI agents to emit and manage fiscal documents (NF-e, NFC-e, NFS-e, CT-e, MDF-e, DC-e) through natural language.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: create, get by ID, list, and retrieve next invoice number. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use the 'solo_' prefix and snake_case, but 'solo_next_invoice_number' is a noun phrase rather than a verb+noun pattern, introducing a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    4 tools cover the core operations for an invoice management server (create, read, list, and a utility). The count is reasonable, though slightly small for a full lifecycle.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set provides create, get, list, and next number, but lacks update and delete/cancel functionality, which are notable gaps for invoice management.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessSyncing