CodeRoot-Authoring-MCP
OfficialThis server enables you to capture, manage, and finalize a structured provenance record (asset-record.json) for an agentic software asset during its build.
Inspect the record contract (
get_record_schema): Retrieve the full JSON Schema defining the required fields, types, and validation rules forasset-record.json.Record creation facts incrementally (
record_facts): Deep-merge technical facts—language, framework, runtime, direct dependencies, repository identity, creation timestamp—into the record as they become known. Can be called repeatedly; each call merges into what is already on disk.Read the current record (
read_record): Fetch the existingasset-record.jsonto see which author-only fields (created_by,maintained_by,model_access.mode) are still missing. A missing file is treated as an empty state, not an error.Finalize and lock the record (
finalize_record): Mark the record as complete. Requires explicit author confirmation of the three author-only fields, either passed directly (after the agent asks the author in conversation) or collected via client-side elicitation. Writes a confirmation block; refuses to write if any confirmation is missing or the record would be invalid.Target any directory: All tools accept a
directoryargument, writingasset-record.jsonin that location.Secure and isolated: Runs with no network access, environment variables, or secrets—only local file manipulation.
Guided workflow prompt (
create_asset_record): Walks through the capture → review → confirm process end to end.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@CodeRoot-Authoring-MCPCreate the asset-record.json for my new agentic asset"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
CodeRoot-Authoring-MCP
An MCP server that captures an agentic asset's foundational record while
the asset is being built. It writes and maintains a single file,
asset-record.json, at the root of the repository being built — creation
facts (language, framework, runtime, direct dependencies, repository
identity) plus three facts only the author can assert (created_by,
maintained_by, model_access.mode). The file is committed alongside the
code and read downstream (by CodeRoot) as declared provenance. It never
affects how the asset is classified.
This server has no configuration, no network access, and no secrets. It reads and writes one JSON file in a directory the caller names.
The record contract
{
"record_version": 1,
"created_by": "settletop-niles",
"created_at": "2026-08-09T00:00:00Z",
"source_repo": {"host": "github.com", "owner": "SettleTop-Inc", "name": "example"},
"maintained_by": "SettleTop-Inc",
"technologies": {
"language": "python",
"framework": "mcp",
"runtime": "python>=3.11",
"dependencies": ["mcp", "httpx"]
},
"model_access": {"mode": "byo", "provider": null, "model": null},
"confirmation": {
"mode": "elicitation",
"confirmed": ["created_by", "maintained_by", "model_access.mode"],
"complete": true
}
}record_versionis required and always1.model_access.modeis"pinned"or"byo";pinnedrequires a non-nullproviderandmodel,byoforces both null.technologies.dependenciesis DIRECT dependencies only (not the resolved tree) — at most 50 entries, 100 chars each.Every string field must be non-blank and at most 200 chars.
Unknown top-level keys are ignored (forward compatible).
This is a summary. The machine-readable contract — the one the server itself
validates against — is served live via the record://schema resource (and
identically by the get_record_schema tool), so a client can always fetch
the current shape instead of trusting a copy in this file.
Related MCP server: tatastu-proof
Tools
Tool | Arguments | Returns |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
record_facts deep-merges its patch into the existing record and is meant to
be called repeatedly, as each fact is decided during the build.
finalize_record is the only tool that marks a record complete: it requires
the author's own confirmation of created_by, maintained_by, and
model_access.mode, and refuses to write anything if the resulting record
would be invalid or a confirmation is missing.
There is also a record://schema resource (identical to get_record_schema)
and a create_asset_record prompt that walks the capture → review → confirm
workflow end to end.
Install
Two ways to run it: a prebuilt container from GHCR, or straight from a local
checkout with uv. Both speak MCP over stdio and both write
asset-record.json into a directory you name. Nothing else — no environment
variables, no tokens, no network.
Run with Docker (GHCR)
The image is published to GitHub Container Registry as
ghcr.io/settletop-inc/coderoot-authoring-mcp, but the package is private,
so authenticate once on this machine before pulling — otherwise docker pull /
docker run returns 403:
# One-time. Use a GitHub Personal Access Token (classic) with the
# read:packages scope as the password.
docker login ghcr.io -u <github-username>
# Or, with the gh CLI:
# gh auth refresh -s read:packages && gh auth token | docker login ghcr.io -u <github-username> --password-stdinThen run the server against the repo you are authoring. Because it writes into a directory, bind-mount that repo and attach stdin:
docker run --rm -i -w /work -v "$PWD:/work" ghcr.io/settletop-inc/coderoot-authoring-mcp-iattaches stdin — required for a stdio MCP server; without it the server has no channel to speak on and exits immediately.-v "$PWD:/work"mounts the repo being authored into the container, so theasset-record.jsonthe server writes lands on your host and survives the container exiting.-w /workmakes/workthe container's working directory, so the tools' defaultdirectory="."resolves to your mounted repo. The image's own working directory is/app, which is not mounted; without-w /worka tool called with the default.writes inside the container and the file is lost on exit. So either pass-w /workas shown, or call the tools with an explicitdirectory="/work". (Every tool also accepts an arbitrarydirectoryargument, so the agent can target any repo path directly.)
On Windows, use ${PWD} in PowerShell or %CD% in cmd.exe in place of
$PWD.
Tags: :latest and :sha-<short> track main; a release is tagged
:vX.Y.Z. No -e flags are needed — this server reads no environment.
Run locally (uv)
Straight from a checkout, no container:
uv run --directory <path-to-this-repo> python -m authoring.serverReplace <path-to-this-repo> with wherever you've cloned
CodeRoot-Authoring-MCP. Installing the package also exposes a
coderoot-authoring-mcp console script (authoring.server:main), an
equivalent entry point to python -m authoring.server for clients that prefer
to invoke it directly. The server talks stdio and needs no environment
variables, tokens, or network access.
Use with Claude Code
Register the server with claude mcp add. Claude Code launches it as a
subprocess and speaks MCP over its stdin/stdout, so the whole launch command
goes after the --.
Docker (private GHCR image — run docker login ghcr.io first, see above):
claude mcp add coderoot-authoring -- docker run --rm -i -w /work -v "$PWD:/work" ghcr.io/settletop-inc/coderoot-authoring-mcpLocal checkout (uv):
claude mcp add coderoot-authoring -- uv run --directory <path-to-this-repo> python -m authoring.serverThen confirm it connected:
claude mcp listcoderoot-authoring should show as connected, and inside a Claude Code session
its four tools — record_facts, read_record, finalize_record,
get_record_schema — plus the create_asset_record prompt become available.
Configuration
There is nothing to configure: authoring/server.py constructs the server at
import with no settings to read, no config file, and no secrets. The only
things that decide where the record is written are the bind mount and the
directory argument the tools already take:
Name | Required? | Meaning |
(environment variables) | — | None. The server reads no environment variables, tokens, or credentials, and makes no network calls. |
| Docker only | Bind-mounts the repo being authored into the container so writes survive the container exiting. |
| Recommended | Makes the mount the container's working directory, so the tools' default |
| No (default | Every tool takes it; the record is always written to |
Skill
skills/creating-agentic-assets/SKILL.md teaches an agent to use this server
proactively while building a new asset — capture facts as they're decided,
finalize before the first push, and never assert the author-only fields on
the author's behalf. Install it by copying or symlinking the skill directory
into ~/.claude/skills/:
ln -s "$(pwd)/skills/creating-agentic-assets" ~/.claude/skills/creating-agentic-assets(On Windows, copy the directory instead of symlinking, or use mklink /D from
an elevated shell.)
Confirmation modes
finalize_record supports two ways to get the author's confirmation of the
three author-only fields:
mode="conversation"(the default, and the floor) — the calling agent asks the author in the conversation, in its own words, and passes their answers inconfirmations. This works with any MCP client, since it needs no special capability, and is what the skill instructs agents to use unless the client is known to support interactive prompting (see "Client support" below).mode="elicitation"— the server asks the client to prompt the author directly, via a typed elicitation request (AuthorConfirmation). Prefer it only for a client you know supports interactive prompting: over MCP, a client that hasn't declared form-elicitation capability gets a protocol-level error (JSON-RPC-32021) before the tool body even runs, and as of this writing the interactive accept path has not been observed live for any client (see "Client support" below — only the cancel path has, over Claude Code headless). The{"error": "confirmation_unavailable", ...}shape only occurs for in-process/direct invocation, not over MCP.
Either way, the confirmation is checked against what was actually passed to
finalize_record in that call — a value written earlier via record_facts
is never treated as a confirmation of itself.
Client support
Live findings, Claude Code headless (claude -p --mcp-config, 2026-08-09):
Instructions: injected. A fresh instance quoted the server's
instructionsfirst sentence verbatim, unprompted, and listed all four tools — the ambient contract reaches the agent on this client.Elicitation: capability declared.
finalize_record(mode="elicitation")did not hit the JSON-RPC-32021capability error; the elicit request went through, the non-interactive harness cancelled it, and the server returned{"error": "confirmation_cancelled"}with nothing written — the cancel path verified over the real wire.Interactive accept path: not yet observed live. The SDK-level accept flow is covered end-to-end by this repo's tests (a real in-memory client answering the elicitation); whether interactive Claude Code renders the form to a human author remains to be confirmed the first time this server is used in a live interactive session. Until then,
mode="conversation"stays the default and the floor — see "Confirmation modes" above.
Development
Requires Python >= 3.11.
uv sync --extra dev
uv run pytest -q152 tests, all green.
License
GPL-3.0-or-later. See LICENSE.
Security
This server handles no secrets: no tokens, no credentials, no network calls.
Its filesystem authority is broader than a single fixed file, though: the
directory argument every tool takes is unrestricted — absolute paths and
.. segments are honored as given, a missing directory is created rather
than rejected, and an existing asset-record.json at the target is merged
into rather than refused. The server runs with exactly the privileges of the
client that launched it — the MCP client is the trust boundary, not this
server — and what bounds what can be written is that the filename is never
caller-controlled: every write lands at <directory>/asset-record.json,
always that exact basename.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables contributing, challenging, discovering, verifying, and querying contestable public records from AI coding tools via MCP.6461MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables creating and verifying permanent, publicly verifiable content provenance stamps via MCP tools.8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceRecords all MCP tool interactions in a centralized ledger, enabling developers to trace, replay, inspect, and audit AI agent workflows.

CarpeOS MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to capture, search, and manage structured memory from agent sessions with append-only events and provenance tracking, providing eight local MCP stdio tools.Apache 2.0
Related MCP Connectors
Artifact store for AI agents. Hosted OAuth at mcp.artifacta.io/mcp; local stdio via npm/PyPI.
Shared, governed long-term memory for AI agents across tools and sessions via MCP and REST.
MCP-native Trust Infrastructure for AI Agents. Persistent encrypted memory with Trust Quotient.
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SettleTop-Inc/CodeRoot-Authoring-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server