Create Quiz

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description carries full burden. It discloses persistence to data/decks.json, display for review, and spaced repetition. However, it does not explain the behavior of the 'append' parameter (whether it replaces or extends) beyond implying both are possible.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise paragraphs; first sentence captures main purpose, second paragraph details question requirements. No unnecessary sentences, efficiently structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers creation, display, persistence, and question requirements. Output schema exists so return values are covered. Missing explicit handling of 'append' behavior, but overall sufficient for an AI agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3. Description adds value by explaining deck_name nesting ('::') and providing detailed formatting rules for questions (clear prompt, 3-4 options, one correct answer, plausible distractors), which goes beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'create (or extend)' and resource 'multiple-choice quiz deck', distinguishing it from sibling tool 'create_deck' by specifying it's for quiz decks with automated question generation based on user request.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description indicates when to use (user wants a quiz), how to structure deck names ('::' nesting), and question formatting rules. It does not explicitly exclude alternatives but provides sufficient context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.