Skip to main content
Glama
SergiFuster

MCP Custom Tools Server

by SergiFuster
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Custom Tools Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • FastAPI MCP Server

      moawizbinyamin
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server providing 21+ tools for mathematical operations, string manipulation, file handling, utilities, and web requests via FastAPI and WebSocket.
      -

    • MCP Server Framework

      tim-akkio
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A general-purpose MCP server that provides utility tools for echo, date/time, and file operations within Claude Code and Claude Desktop. It functions as an extensible framework designed to help developers easily build and register custom Python-based tools.
      11
      -

    • Promethean OS MCP

      octave-commons
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A unified MCP server with composable tools for GitHub operations, file management, shell execution, kanban boards, Discord messaging, and package management. Features role-based security, HTTP/stdio transports, and a web-based development UI.
      -

    • Simple MCP Server

      TrueBad0ur
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A self-contained, dependency-free MCP server that provides utility tools for time, date, mathematical calculations, and shell command execution. It supports remote connectivity through SSE and is designed for easy deployment via Docker.
      GPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there are a few potential overlaps: 'build_url' and 'parse_url' both handle URL components, 'encode_decode' and 'url_encode_decode' both handle encoding/decoding, and 'generate_hash' and 'calculate_file_hash' both handle hashing. However, the descriptions clarify their specific contexts (text vs. file vs. URL), so misselection is unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., 'analyze_text', 'calculate_age', 'get_system_info'). There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the set predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 31 tools, the count is borderline high for a general-purpose utility server. While many tools are useful, the set feels heavy and could be streamlined (e.g., merging related tools like 'encode_decode' and 'url_encode_decode'). It's not extreme, but it approaches the upper limit of reasonable scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers a broad range of utility functions (text analysis, system info, file operations, URL handling, etc.) with good coverage in each area. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tool for writing files or more advanced text processing, but agents can work around these with the available tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources