Skip to main content
Glama
Seraphoenixy

Ygdria MCP Server

by Seraphoenixy

Related Servers

Alternatives to Ygdria MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets AI agents read and write a self-hosted TriliumNext knowledge base over its ETAPI, enabling note capture, structured table maintenance, and search.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agents to read, write, and organize notes in a local-first, human-in-the-loop note-taking app.
      1 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables creating, linking, searching, exploring, and synthesizing atomic notes as a knowledge graph through MCP-compatible clients such as Claude. Supports tags, note types, semantic relationships, Markdown storage, and an SQLite index for efficient traversal.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to create, link, explore, and synthesize atomic notes as a knowledge graph through Claude and other MCP-compatible clients. It supports tagging, search, note types, semantic link types, and Markdown-file storage indexed by SQLite.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to create, link, search, explore, and synthesize atomic notes and knowledge graphs through Claude and other MCP-compatible clients, with Markdown-backed storage and SQLite indexing.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The set has several overlapping clusters: tree exploration is split across list_tree_roots, get_tree_node, list_tree_children, get_tree_subtree, resolve_tree_nodes, and get_tree_overview, and content modification is split across update_note, edit_content, replace_content, append_content, and replace_section. Descriptions do provide guidance on when to use each, but an agent can still hesitate between the budgeted overview tools and the explicit subtree tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names consistently use snake_case and a predictable verb_noun or verb_prep_noun pattern, such as search_notes, get_note, create_note, update_tags, replace_section, and move_placement. Singular/plural distinctions like move_placement versus move_placements are also clear and intentional.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 21 tools, the server is on the heavy side for a note/tree API and has many specialized navigation and editing operations. The count is not extreme, but it is borderline enough that agents must choose among several similarly scoped tree and content tools.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers note search, reading, creation, updates, content editing, tag updates, and placement moves well. However, there are notable lifecycle gaps: no delete_note or delete_placement tools and no explicit tool for creating or deleting placement tree nodes, which may cause dead ends for full resource management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues