F
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for managing product initiatives, architecture decisions, requirements, and releases, enabling AI tools to interact with architectural documentation and planning.
-
tok_mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to tok_mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing interactive prompts for designing and reviewing microfrontend and microservice architectures, with embedded development rules and best practices.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to design and deploy WRedis/Redis-backed services using expert patterns, architecture scaffolding, and a unified CLI.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that designs software projects by drafting design documents with an LLM, refining them, answering questions, and creating projects via the AI2DEV API.4-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI coding agents structured access to a project's architecture, rules, modules, and technical decisions.MIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI coding assistants persistent memory, structural code graph analysis, and safe multi-agent coordination, enabling them to answer architectural questions, track decisions across sessions, and coordinate safely in multi-agent workflows.394-
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: interactive design, cost estimation, doc generation, reference patterns, scaling strategies, and CPU architecture recommendation. No overlap.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., design_architecture, estimate_cost). Convention is uniform and predictable.
Tool Count5/5
6 tools is well-scoped for the domain of cloud architecture design. Each tool justifies its existence without bloat or deficiency.
Completeness4/5
Covers core lifecycle: design, cost, docs, reference, scaling, and hardware recommendation. Minor gaps like missing a tool for modifying architectures or handling non-AWS providers, but adequate for the intended scope.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues