Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to docx-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for generating Word documents and Google Docs with structured formatting, templates, and rich text.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A unified MCP server for document processing that enables creating, editing, and converting Word documents (DOCX), PDFs, Markdown, and images, with support for templates, formatting, and batch operations.
      100
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A FastMCP-powered microserver that allows users to programmatically generate well-formatted .docx documents with consistent styling, including features like titles, paragraphs, headings, citations, and footers.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Office documents — create, edit, fill templates, convert, and extract Word/Excel/PowerPoint. LaTeX-style markup, math formulas, PDF export, template loops, and document diff. stdio / SSE / Streamable HTTP with auth and rate limiting.
      12
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a clear purpose: create_document and convert_markdown both produce .docx files but differ in input (structured content vs. Markdown), and save_theme/list_themes handle theme persistence. The only minor ambiguity is choosing between the two document-generation tools, but their descriptions clarify the distinction.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names consistently use snake_case with a verb prefix, which is predictable. The slight deviation is convert_markdown, which names the input format rather than the output object, unlike the other verb_noun names.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a well-scoped set for a focused docx creation server: two document-generation paths and two theme-management utilities. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core workflow of generating .docx files and managing reusable themes. Minor gaps exist, such as no delete_theme or ability to edit existing documents, but these are workable limitations rather than critical dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues