Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Encryptor MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI memory persistence and secure credential management via vault tools for MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and VS Code.
      12
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to persistently remember user preferences and context through client-side encrypted vaults, ensuring memory is portable and private across different MCP clients.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to access a shared portable vault for memory, skills, and API credentials through MCP, so tools can store and retrieve memories, read versioned skill playbooks, and make server-side API calls without exposing secret keys.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access a local-first personal context and memory layer through MCP tools for bootstrapping user context, semantically searching Markdown vault knowledge, reading files, listing topics, and adding controlled memories. It provides deterministic context retrieval, provenance-cited vector search, and secure vault operations while keeping data local and model-independent.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding tools to securely manage secrets via MCP tools for vault operations, diagnostics, and cloud sync, ensuring real keys never enter the LLM context.
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and development tools to interact with Obsidian vaults via MCP, providing direct filesystem access for reading, writing, searching, and managing notes without requiring Obsidian to be running.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with explicit cross-references in descriptions (e.g., find vs list_folder, read_file vs file_info, trash vs empty_trash, undo vs restore_version). There are no overlapping or ambiguous operations that would cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use snake_case, which is consistent. However, the grammatical pattern varies: many are verb_noun (list_folder, read_file, write_file), but several are simple verbs (find, move, undo) or noun phrases (vaults, file_info, versions). This is mostly predictable but not a strict verb_noun pattern throughout.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 23 tools, the set is on the heavy side for a typical MCP server. However, each tool maps to a distinct operation in a complex encrypted-vault domain, so the count is justified rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core CRUD, versioning, undo, trash management, health checks, and search, which is strong for the domain. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool to create a new vault, no cross-vault move/copy, and no binary file handling beyond text.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues