Skip to main content
Glama
Seiya-wasabi

mcp-server-security-snapshot

by Seiya-wasabi

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
NETWORKNobase or base-sepoliabase
API_BASE_URLNoOverride API endpointhttps://api.cybersecurity-japan.com
WALLET_PRIVATE_KEYYesPrivate key of paying wallet (0x...)

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
scan_security_headersA

Scan a public URL and return its HTTP security header status. Checks: HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, HTTPS enforcement, redirect chain, security.txt, robots.txt, sitemap.xml. Costs 0.05 USDC per call (paid automatically from the configured wallet). Use this to audit a website's security hygiene before recommending improvements.

demo_security_snapshotA

Returns a pre-baked example security snapshot (no payment required). Use this to test your integration or demonstrate the output format without spending USDC.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have completely distinct purposes: demo_security_snapshot provides a static example for testing, while scan_security_headers performs an active scan of a URL's security headers. There is no functional overlap or ambiguity between them.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (demo_security_snapshot, scan_security_headers) using snake_case. The verbs 'demo' and 'scan' clearly indicate their different actions, maintaining perfect consistency throughout the set.

Tool Count2/5

With only 2 tools, the server feels severely under-scoped for a security snapshot domain. While the tools are distinct, a security-focused server would typically need more operations (e.g., historical scans, configuration management, or additional scan types) to provide comprehensive coverage.

Completeness2/5

The toolset is highly incomplete for security snapshot functionality. It lacks core operations like retrieving past scans, managing scan configurations, or covering other security aspects beyond HTTP headers. Agents will face dead ends when trying to perform typical security audit workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues