mcp-server-security-snapshot
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| NETWORK | No | base or base-sepolia | base |
| API_BASE_URL | No | Override API endpoint | https://api.cybersecurity-japan.com |
| WALLET_PRIVATE_KEY | Yes | Private key of paying wallet (0x...) |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| scan_security_headersA | Scan a public URL and return its HTTP security header status. Checks: HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, HTTPS enforcement, redirect chain, security.txt, robots.txt, sitemap.xml. Costs 0.05 USDC per call (paid automatically from the configured wallet). Use this to audit a website's security hygiene before recommending improvements. |
| demo_security_snapshotA | Returns a pre-baked example security snapshot (no payment required). Use this to test your integration or demonstrate the output format without spending USDC. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: demo_security_snapshot provides a static example for testing, while scan_security_headers performs an active scan of a URL's security headers. There is no functional overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (demo_security_snapshot, scan_security_headers) using snake_case. The verbs 'demo' and 'scan' clearly indicate their different actions, maintaining perfect consistency throughout the set.
With only 2 tools, the server feels severely under-scoped for a security snapshot domain. While the tools are distinct, a security-focused server would typically need more operations (e.g., historical scans, configuration management, or additional scan types) to provide comprehensive coverage.
The toolset is highly incomplete for security snapshot functionality. It lacks core operations like retrieving past scans, managing scan configurations, or covering other security aspects beyond HTTP headers. Agents will face dead ends when trying to perform typical security audit workflows.