heap-seance
<p align="center">
<img src="assets/banner.png" alt="Heap Seance" width="100%">
</p>
<h1 align="center">Heap Seance</h1>
<p align="center">
<em>Summoning retained objects from the heap — so you can interrogate what refuses to die.</em>
</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="LICENSE-MIT"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue.svg" alt="MIT"></a>
<a href="LICENSE-APACHE"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/license-Apache_2.0-blue.svg" alt="Apache 2.0"></a>
<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.10+-green.svg" alt="Python 3.10+">
<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/JDK-17+-orange.svg" alt="JDK 17+">
<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/MCP-server-purple.svg" alt="MCP Server">
<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Claude_Code-plugin-blueviolet.svg" alt="Claude Code Plugin">
</p>
<p align="center">
An MCP server + CLI toolkit that channels the spirits of <code>jcmd</code>, <code>jmap</code>, <code>jstat</code>, <code>jfr</code>, Eclipse MAT, and async-profiler into a structured leak investigation workflow — designed to run inside <a href="https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code">Claude Code</a>.
</p>
<p align="center">
2 slash commands. 8 MCP tools. Conservative by default.
</p>
---
<p align="center">
<a href="#how-it-works">How It Works</a> •
<a href="#quick-start">Quick Start</a> •
<a href="#mcp-tools">MCP Tools</a> •
<a href="#investigation-workflow">Workflow</a> •
<a href="#prerequisites">Prerequisites</a> •
<a href="#contributing">Contributing</a>
</p>
---
## How It Works
Heap Seance follows a two-stage escalation model. No deep forensics unless the evidence demands it.
```
/leak-scan /leak-deep
| |
v v
3x class histogram (all of scan, plus)
+ GC pressure snapshot JFR recording
| heap dump
v MAT leak suspects
monotonic growth? async-profiler alloc profile
old-gen pressure? |
| v
+--- both true? -----> auto-escalate to deep
|
+--- otherwise ------> verdict + next steps
```
**Confidence is earned, not assumed.** `high` requires at least two independent strong signals. A single growing class is `watch`. Growth plus GC pressure is `suspicious`. Add a MAT dominator or JFR correlation and you get `probable_memory_leak`.
## Quick Start
Requires [uv](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/getting-started/installation/), Python 3.10+, and a JDK 17+ for tooling (the target app can run any Java version).
### 1. Clone
```bash
git clone https://github.com/your-org/heap-seance.git
```
### 2. Add `.mcp.json` to your Java project
In the project you want to investigate, create a `.mcp.json`:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"heap-seance": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "--directory", "/path/to/heap-seance", "python", "-m", "heap_seance_mcp.server"],
"env": {
"JAVA_HOME": "/path/to/jdk-17",
"MAT_BIN": "/path/to/ParseHeapDump.sh",
"ASYNC_PROFILER_BIN": "/path/to/asprof"
}
}
}
}
```
`--directory` points to where you cloned Heap Seance. `uv run` handles the virtual environment and dependencies automatically. `ASYNC_PROFILER_BIN` is optional — if missing, deep mode continues with JFR + MAT.
### 3. Copy the Claude Code commands
Copy the `.claude/commands/` folder into your Java project so the `/leak-scan` and `/leak-deep` slash commands are available:
```bash
cp -r /path/to/heap-seance/.claude/commands/ .claude/commands/
```
### 4. Run
```bash
/leak-scan my-service # conservative scan
/leak-deep 12345 # full forensics by PID
```
Heap Seance resolves the target process, collects evidence, and returns a structured verdict.
## MCP Tools
| Tool | What it does |
|------|-------------|
| `java_list_processes()` | Discover running JVMs via `jcmd -l` |
| `java_class_histogram(pid)` | Snapshot live object counts per class |
| `java_gc_snapshot(pid)` | Sample `jstat -gcutil` over time |
| `java_jfr_start(pid)` | Capture a JFR recording |
| `java_jfr_summary(jfr_file)` | Summarize JFR event types and counts |
| `java_heap_dump(pid)` | Full heap dump (`.hprof`) |
| `java_mat_suspects(heap_dump)` | Run MAT leak suspects analysis |
| `java_async_alloc_profile(pid)` | Allocation flame graph via async-profiler |
Every tool returns the same unified schema:
```json
{
"status": "ok | warn | error",
"evidence": ["..."],
"metrics": {},
"confidence": "none | low | medium | high",
"next_recommended_action": "...",
"raw_artifact_path": "..."
}
```
## Investigation Workflow
1. **Start your app** and let it initialize fully.
2. **`/leak-scan <name-or-pid>`** — takes the first histogram snapshot.
3. **Exercise the suspect behavior** — the scan prompts you between each of the 3 histogram samples to perform the action you suspect is leaking (open/close views, send requests, repeat workflows). This is critical — without load between samples, leaks stay invisible.
4. **Read the verdict.** Focus on `Confidence`, `Key Evidence`, `Suspect Types`.
5. **`/leak-deep <name-or-pid>`** if the scan flags growth, or if you want full forensics regardless.
6. **Fix and re-scan.** Bounded caches, weak refs, listener cleanup — then `/leak-scan` again to confirm the signal drops.
7. **Keep artifacts.** `.jfr`, `.hprof`, and MAT reports are saved for team review.
### What you get back
**`/leak-scan`** returns: Verdict, Confidence, Key Evidence, Suspect Types, Artifacts, Next Steps.
**`/leak-deep`** goes further: Verdict, Confidence, Root Holder Hypothesis (who retains the growing objects and via which field/chain), Supporting Evidence, Artifacts, Remediation Hypotheses (concrete fix suggestions), Verification Plan.
### Confidence ladder
| Confidence | What it means | Signals required |
|------------|--------------|-----------------|
| `none` | No leak evidence | — |
| `low` | Weak growth, no GC pressure | histogram only |
| `medium` | Growth + GC is losing | histogram + GC pressure |
| `high` | Probable leak, corroborated | histogram + GC + MAT/JFR |
## Prerequisites
**Tooling JDK** (required):
- JDK 17+ for `jcmd`, `jmap`, `jstat` — set via `JAVA_HOME` in `.mcp.json`
- The target application can run any Java version (including Java 8)
**Deep forensics** (for `/leak-deep`):
- [Eclipse MAT CLI](https://eclipse.dev/mat/downloads.php) (`ParseHeapDump.sh` / `.bat`) — required for deep mode
- [async-profiler](https://github.com/async-profiler/async-profiler/releases) — optional tie-breaker
**Optional tools:**
- `jfr` CLI — used for JFR summary if available, falls back to `jcmd JFR.view` otherwise. JFR is skipped entirely for Java 8 targets (incompatible format).
Check your setup:
```bash
./scripts/check_prereqs.sh # macOS / Linux
scripts\check_prereqs.bat # Windows
```
### Environment overrides
Set these in your `.mcp.json` `env` block (recommended) or as shell variables:
| Variable | Required | Description |
|----------|----------|-------------|
| `JAVA_HOME` | recommended | JDK 17+ installation path — `$JAVA_HOME/bin` is searched first for `jcmd`, `jmap`, `jstat`, `jfr`. Also used to launch MAT with the correct Java version. |
| `MAT_BIN` | for deep mode | Path to `ParseHeapDump.sh` (macOS/Linux) or `.bat` (Windows) |
| `ASYNC_PROFILER_BIN` | optional | Path to async-profiler binary — tie-breaker evidence, deep mode works without it |
| `HEAP_SEANCE_ARTIFACT_DIR` | optional | Where `.jfr`, `.hprof`, and reports are saved (default: system temp dir) |
| `MCP_TRANSPORT` | optional | Transport protocol: `stdio` (default), `sse`, or `streamable-http` |
| `MCP_HOST` | optional | Bind address for SSE/HTTP transport (default: `0.0.0.0`) |
| `MCP_PORT` | optional | Port for SSE/HTTP transport (default: `8000`) |
CLI flags `--sse` and `--streamable-http` can be used instead of `MCP_TRANSPORT`.
See `.mcp.json.example` for a full config template.
### Compatibility notes
- **Java 8 targets**: histogram + GC + MAT work fully. JFR is skipped (v0.9 format incompatible with modern tools).
- **Windows**: MAT works via `ParseHeapDump.bat`. async-profiler is optional — if missing, deep mode continues with JFR + MAT. Locale-specific decimal separators (comma vs dot) in `jstat` output are handled automatically.
- **MAT + JAVA_HOME**: MAT is launched with the JDK from `JAVA_HOME`, so it works even if the system default Java is too old for MAT.
## CLI Usage (without Claude Code)
```bash
uv run heap-seance --mode scan --match your-app
uv run heap-seance --mode deep --pid 12345 --output json
```
<details>
<summary><strong>Installing uv</strong></summary>
```bash
# macOS / Linux
curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
# Windows (PowerShell)
powershell -ExecutionPolicy ByPass -c "irm https://astral.sh/uv/install.ps1 | iex"
```
</details>
<details>
<summary><strong>Manual setup (without uv)</strong></summary>
```bash
python3 -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate # Windows: .\.venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1
pip install -e .
heap-seance --mode scan --match your-app
```
</details>
## Tests
```bash
python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -p "test_*.py"
```
Example Java scenarios for validation live in `examples/java-scenarios/` — a real leak, a bounded cache (no leak), and a burst allocator (no leak).
## Contributing
Contributions welcome! See [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) for guidelines on adding tools, signals, and skills.
## License
This project is dual-licensed under either of
- [Apache License, Version 2.0](LICENSE-APACHE)
- [MIT License](LICENSE-MIT)
at your option.
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Tools cover distinct diagnostic actions—process listing, heap dump, class histogram, MAT suspects, JFR start/summary, GC snapshot, allocation profile—so an agent can usually pick based on the futored operation. Minor proximity exists between heap_dump and class_histogram, but names plus conceptual roles keep them separate.
All names share the java_ prefix and snake_case, which helps. However, the verb placement is inconsistent: list_processes and jfr_start use a verb, while mat_suspects, class_histogram, and gc_snapshot are pure noun phrases without an obvious action word.
Eight tools is well within the ideal range for a focused Java diagnostics server. Each tool covers a distinct diagnostic technique (JFR, heap analysis, allocation profiling, GC snapshots), and none feel redundant or extraneous.
The server covers the core heap and JFR workflows: process discovery, heap dumps, class histograms, MAT suspect analysis, and JFR capture/summarization. The main gap is the lack of a JFR stop or thread dump tool, but agents can still achieve the primary diagnosis goals.