Skip to main content
Glama
SecretiveShell

searxng

by SecretiveShell
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to searxng

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • searxng-deepdive

      burakaydinofficial
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for SearXNG that provides LLM agents with advanced search tools, including engine and category targeting, multi-page fanout, and dynamic descriptions from the live engine pool.
      4
      26 npm
      1
      MIT

    • searxng-mcp

      88plug
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for SearXNG that provides web search capabilities with concise model-visible output while preserving full result payloads in metadata. It supports search, parallel fetching, URL extraction, and research workflows through both local stdio and streamable HTTP transports.
      7
      2
      -

    • searxng-mcp

      paulleungtc-git
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects to a self-hosted SearXNG instance and exposes web search capabilities over MCP HTTP (JSON-RPC), enabling AI chatbots to search the internet for real-time information.
      109 npm
      GPL 2.0

    • mcp-searxng-local

      dduartee
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for local web search via SearXNG, providing unlimited queries without API keys or cost, with automatic fallback to public instances.
      3
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool has a clear, distinct purpose of web searching.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against for patterns or conventions.

    Tool Count2/5

    One tool is too few for a web search server, as it lacks operations like filtering results, managing search history, or configuring engines. This minimal scope limits functionality and feels incomplete for the domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for web searching, offering only a basic search function. Missing are essential features like result pagination, advanced query options, or engine selection, which are typical in search APIs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources