get_blocklist
Retrieve your current WhatsApp blocklist in JSON format to review blocked contacts.
Instructions
Return the user's current WhatsApp blocklist as JSON.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve your current WhatsApp blocklist in JSON format to review blocked contacts.
Return the user's current WhatsApp blocklist as JSON.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true. The description adds that it returns JSON format, which is useful behavioral context beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no redundancy, front-loaded with the key action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no parameters, good annotations, and description specifies return format. No missing information given the simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters defined in input schema, so schema coverage is 100%. Description does not need to add parameter details; baseline for 0 params is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action ('Return'), the resource ('user's current WhatsApp blocklist'), and the output format ('as JSON'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'block_contact' and 'unblock_contact' which modify the blocklist.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use (to get the blocklist) but does not explicitly state when not to use or suggest alternatives. Given the sibling tools, context is sufficient but lacks explicit guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Sealjay/mcp-whatsapp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server