mcp-hey
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-hey
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables semantic search and AI-powered analysis of Outlook emails using RAG-based natural language queries and Vision AI for architectural documents, with specialized support for AEC workflows.MIT
Related Servers
- MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceLocal MCP server for multi-account IMAP/SMTP email (iCloud + Gmail via app-specific passwords). Never marks mail read. Cross-folder search, idempotent sends, TLS verified.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes a local notmuch email database to an LLM client such as Claude. It is read-first: searching, reading, and understanding mail is always available; writing anything (drafts, tags, exported files) requires an explicit opt-in flag and is confined to clearly bounded locations.132MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA minimal MCP server for reading, searching, managing, and sending email over IMAP and SMTP.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA self-hostable Gmail MCP server that enables Gmail search/read, sending, replies, drafts, labels, and attachment downloads via MCP tools with OAuth authorization. Supports stdio and streamable HTTP transports.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that drives macOS Mail: read, search, send, organise.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 37 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct actions, and descriptions explicitly guide choice between similar pairs (hey_screen vs hey_screen_by_id, hey_set_aside vs hey_reply_later, hey_bubble_up vs hey_bubble_up_if_no_reply). The main soft spot is the read-state trio (hey_mark_seen, hey_mark_unseen, hey_read_status), which is subtly differentiated (tray dot vs thread vs entry) and could trip up an agent, but the descriptions do address it.
Every tool uses a consistent hey_ snake_case prefix, which makes the set scan cleanly. Minor deviation: some names are verb_noun (hey_list_emails, hey_send_email) while others are state-noun or ad hoc (hey_imbox_summary, hey_cache_status, hey_thread_mute), but the convention is stable and readable throughout.
At 37 tools this is on the heavy side and pushes past the comfortable 3-15 band. The email-client domain justifies breadth, but several clusters could be consolidated (three read-state tools, three bubble-up tools, separate list/view tools) rather than expanded separately.
Coverage is broad: listing across views, search, read, reply/forward/send, drafts, labels, collections, screener, set-aside/reply-later, bubbling, muting, moving, and status changes. Explicit gaps are acknowledged (drafts can't be sent via MCP, screener reversals are UI-only), which are minor relative to the surface.