Skip to main content
Glama
ScienceLiveHub

forrt-research-mcp

by ScienceLiveHub
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to forrt-research-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • clearon-source-audit

      kwgoodwin
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables revision-bound source audits with exact article fingerprinting, claim-to-source mapping, quotation verification, and immutable JSON evidence reports for prepublication review.
      9
      MIT

    • io.github.xngg1021/academic

      xngg1021
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic, harness-neutral research workflows by unifying research object identity, evidence receipts, claim-evidence graphs, and append-only decision logs, along with specialized scholarly skills for literature analysis, reproducibility audits, and multi-agent review.
      1
      -

    • RefSentry

      LloydPhuc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to verify citations and bibliographies and to check whether source documents support factual claims, using local inference, exact evidence provenance, and deterministic verdicts.
      MIT

    • CiteAnything MCP Server

      veriglow
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create verifiable, replayable citations, search private knowledge bases, and publish Markdown with verified citation markers.
      MIT

    • litcheck-mcp

      javrodriguez
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables scientists and their AI agents to check quoted passages against pinned open-access PubMed Central full texts, look up retraction status from PMC and Crossref, and run recorded literature searches. Every quote check, search and annotation is written to an append-only, hash-chained log that can be verified, giving a dated record of what was searched and found.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context All Your Agents Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and hold it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: validation (validate_draft, validate_drafts, validate_chain_draft, verify_chain, verify_quote), lookup (wikidata_lookup, template_fields, vocabulary, resolve_doi, list_schemas), and chain exploration (constellation, constellation_raw, prior_work). The validation tools are distinguished by their target (individual draft vs directory vs chain-draft vs published chain vs quotation), and the lookup tools are distinguished by what they return. Even the two constellation tools are clearly separated by raw vs projected output.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a consistent pattern: verb_noun (validate_draft, validate_drafts, validate_chain_draft, verify_chain, verify_quote, resolve_doi, list_schemas, template_fields, wikidata_lookup) or noun-only (constellation, constellation_raw, prior_work, vocabulary). The noun-only names are understandable but break the verb_noun pattern, and 'constellation_raw' uses an adjective suffix. Overall consistent and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well within the ideal range (3-15) and each tool serves a distinct, necessary function for the FORRT nanopub workflow: validation (5 tools), lookup (5 tools), and chain exploration (3 tools). The count matches the server's purpose of supporting drafting, validating, and publishing nanopub chains.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the full workflow: template lookup, vocabulary lookup, Wikidata lookup, DOI resolution, draft validation (individual and batch), chain-draft validation, published chain verification, quotation verification, and chain exploration. Minor gaps exist: there is no tool for creating or publishing a nanopub (the server is validation/lookup only), and no tool for exploring a single step's details beyond template_fields. However, for the server's stated purpose (research assistance, not publishing), the coverage is strong.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources