Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to fip-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and builders to run governance assessments including A³ scorecards, evidence-chain templates, compliance checklists, passport lookup, privacy/credential scanning, and doctrine knowledge routing, with traceable audit-ready outputs. It provides local, zero-dependency tools for AI governance self-assessment and registration readiness.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agentic research workflows to prepare scholarly deposits with deterministic validation, file manifests, and package digests, and to create/update Zenodo drafts, while requiring operator-signed approval before publication.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and builders to run local, audit-traceable governance assessments, including an A³ scorecard, ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST evidence templates, compliance checklists, passport lookup, and sensitive-text screening.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to verify bibliographic records and metadata consistency across sources like Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and arXiv without destructive edits to the source .bib file. It exposes identifier-first lookup, explainable multi-signal matching, and structured provider outcomes through the official MCP SDK.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct role: listing communities, retrieving a community profile, giving a topic recommendation, checking a target, and comparing two communities. The boundaries between profile, recommend, check, and crosswalk are clear from their descriptions, and the shared FIP URI input convention does not create selection ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names are single lowercase words, which is a readable and consistent surface style. However, they mix nouns and verbs (communities/profile vs recommend/check), so they do not follow a strict action-oriented verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well scoped for an FIP advisory/checking server: discovery, profile inspection, topic recommendation, compliance checking, and cross-community comparison. Each tool has a clear place, with no obvious redundancy or missing scale.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core read-only FIP workflows: finding communities, reading their latest profile choices, recommending agreed resources, checking targets, and crosswalking between communities. Minor gaps include no explicit topic/question listing tool and no broader FIP-authoring lifecycle, but these are not required for the apparent advisory purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessOutdated data