Skip to main content
Glama
Schneckenhausmann

google-nice-mcp

by Schneckenhausmann
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to google-nice-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Gmail MCP Server

      jlg-formation
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for Gmail that enables searching threads, reading messages, and listing labels without any write access.
      81
      MIT

    • Gmail MCP Gateway

      systheno
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents full read and organizational access to multiple Gmail accounts — and no ability to send, trash, or delete mail.
      MIT

    • gmail-research-mcp

      bajor
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only Gmail MCP server that searches email, fetches complete threads, and stores them as local Markdown and JSON for offline analysis by other agents.
      1
      -

    • MailMesh MCP

      culpen90
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A private, single-user MCP server that unifies Gmail, Microsoft 365/Outlook, and IMAP mailboxes for LLMs to search and read emails live, without storing or caching mailbox contents.
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Tools are clearly separated by service prefix (drive_ vs gmail_) and have distinct purposes: listing drives, searching and reading files, searching and reading emails. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow a service_verb[_object] pattern with underscores, but some use a bare verb (drive_search, gmail_search) while others include an object (drive_list_shared_drives, drive_read_file, gmail_read_email). Slight inconsistency but the pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools covering two Google services, the count is well-scoped. Each tool serves a clear purpose and there is no bloat or deficiency for the apparent scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers search and read operations for both Drive and Gmail, but lacks any write or update capabilities (e.g., create, delete, send). This is a notable gap that may require additional tools for full lifecycle coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources