Skip to main content
Glama
Schmoll86

trust-mcp

by Schmoll86
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to trust-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • trust-mcp

      BillyTheManBot
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to verify each other's trust scores, register, submit reviews, and find trusted agents before transacting.
      4
      5 npm
      MIT

    • MolTrust

      MoltyCel
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MolTrust MCP Server provides AI agents with identity verification, reputation scoring, and verifiable credentials through W3C DID-based trust infrastructure. Includes ERC-8004 on-chain agent registration and Base blockchain anchoring for tamper-proof credential verification.
      48
      4
      MIT

    • aip-identity

      The-Nexus-Guard
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent identity — verify agents with Ed25519 signatures, check trust scores, sign and verify content, exchange encrypted messages. Built on the Agent Identity Protocol (AIP).
      8
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between trust_review, trust_dispute, and trust_endorse, all of which affect an agent's score through different mechanisms. The descriptions help clarify, but an agent could potentially confuse which to use for positive or negative feedback.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the consistent 'trust_' prefix, which makes the set easy to recognize. However, the suffixes mix verbs (lookup, register, verify, search, endorse, dispute) and nouns (challenge, evidence, transaction, history, review), making the naming pattern not strictly uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the set is well-scoped for a trust registry. Each tool covers a specific aspect of the domain—registration, lookup, verification, feedback, evidence, disputes, endorsements, transactions, and history—without feeling bloated or too sparse.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides comprehensive coverage of trust management: registering agents, querying scores, searching, verifying identities, submitting reviews, evidence, disputes, endorsements, recording transactions, and viewing score history. No major gaps are apparent for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources