Thinking Agent MCP
Thinking Agent MCP
Extend your thinking model's chain of thought via MCP tools โ a Model Context Protocol server that exposes chat_agent, create_branch, and get_branch_details tools, enabling thinking models to offload subtasks to non-thinking models and build tree-structured multi-perspective analysis.
Features
๐ง Chain of Thought Extension โ Thinking models can delegate reasoning subtasks to non-thinking models via
chat_agent, extending effective reasoning depth beyond single-model token limits๐ณ Tree-Structured Thinking โ
create_branchenables recursive, multi-perspective exploration with four branch types (drill down / verify / explore / stash)๐ Full Traceability โ
get_branch_detailsretrieves the complete raw reasoning process of any created branch๐ก๏ธ Context Isolation โ Tools are stateless and self-contained; all context must be packed into
input_text. No conversation history dependency๐๏ธ Parameter Control โ Fine-grained control over tool model output via
temperature,top_p,seed,stop, andmax_tokens๐ Dual API Support โ Works with both DeepSeek official API (recommended) and SiliconFlow API
Table of Contents
Quick Start
# Clone and install
git clone https://github.com/ScarletLilith/DeepSeekV4Flash_Thinking_TreeMCP.git
cd meditatorMCP
npm install
# Configure API (see Configuration section below)
# edit test/config.json or set environment variables
# Start the server
npm run build
npm start
# Or run development mode
npm run devConfiguration
Configuration is loaded with the following priority: Environment variables > test/config.json
Option 1: DeepSeek Official API (Recommended)
export DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=sk-your-key
export DEEPSEEK_BASE_URL=https://api.deepseek.com
export DEEPSEEK_MODEL=deepseek-v4-proNote: DeepSeek's thinking mode uses
thinking: {type: "enabled"}(notenable_thinking: true).
Option 2: SiliconFlow API (Fallback)
export SILICONFLOW_API_KEY=sk-your-key
export SILICONFLOW_BASE_URL=https://api.siliconflow.cn/v1
export SILICONFLOW_MODEL=deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-FlashConfig File
Create test/config.json (gitignored automatically):
{
"baseUrl": "https://api.deepseek.com",
"model": "deepseek-v4-pro",
"apiKey": "sk-xxx"
}Tools
chat_agent
Calls a non-thinking model to execute an independent subtask, extending the thinking model's chain of thought.
Parameters
Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|
| required | Complete, self-contained task description with all context |
|
| optional | System prompt for role/behavior constraints |
|
|
| Sampling temperature (0.0โ2.0). Low = precise, high = creative |
|
|
| Nucleus sampling threshold (0.0โ1.0) |
|
|
| Maximum output tokens (enforced server-side via API) |
|
|
| Stop sequences; empty array = natural completion |
|
| optional | Random seed for reproducible output (with low temperature) |
Parameter Strategies
Verification: temperature=0.1, top_p=0.1, max_tokens=2048, seed=42
Exploration: temperature=1.2, top_p=0.95, max_tokens=4096
Balanced: temperature=0.5, top_p=0.8, max_tokens=4096create_branch
Creates a thinking branch node with recursive nesting support for deep multi-perspective analysis.
Parameters
Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|
| required | Session ID, consistent within a single reasoning session |
|
| required | Self-contained subtask description (โฅ30 characters) |
|
|
| Branch type: |
|
|
| Parent node ID for tree nesting |
Four Branch Types:
Type | Temperature | Purpose |
| 0.2 | Deep-dive into a subproblem with focused precision |
| 0.0 | Verify a conclusion or hypothesis with maximal determinism |
| 1.0 | Divergent thinking from different angles with high creativity |
| 0.6 | Temporarily record intermediate thoughts for later reference |
Response
{
"status": "success",
"node_id": "n_a1b2c3d4",
"conclusion": "The extracted conclusion text...",
"confidence": 0.85,
"remaining_quota": 12,
"suggestions": [
"ๅๆฃๆข็ดขๅฎๆ๏ผๅฏๅฏนๆไปทๅผ็ๆนๅ็จ drill_down ๆทฑๅ
ฅ",
"่ฟๅฏๅๅปบ 12 ไธชๅๆฏ๏ผๅปบ่ฎฎ็ปง็ปญๅค่งๅบฆๆข็ดข"
]
}get_branch_details
Retrieves the complete raw reasoning process of a previously created branch node.
Parameters
Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|
| required | Session ID |
|
| required | Branch node ID returned by |
Response
{
"status": "success",
"node_id": "n_a1b2c3d4",
"raw_process": "The complete raw reasoning output from the model..."
}Error Handling
Tools return structured errors with type and action fields for the thinking model to make informed decisions:
{
"success": false,
"type": "api",
"action": "report",
"error": "API authentication failed (401)",
"status_code": 401
}Error Type |
| Trigger |
|
| DNS resolution failure, connection refused |
|
| 429 rate limited |
|
| 401 authentication failure |
|
| 5xx server errors |
|
| Empty |
|
| Missing API Key / Model configuration |
The server-side retry mechanism uses exponential backoff with jitter (1sโ3sโ7s, max 3 retries) for 429 and 5xx errors. Network errors (ENOTFOUND, ECONNREFUSED, ECONNRESET) are not automatically retried.
MCP Client Setup
Claude Desktop
{
"mcpServers": {
"thinking-agent": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["path/to/meditatorMCP/dist/index.js"],
"env": {
"DEEPSEEK_API_KEY": "sk-your-key",
"DEEPSEEK_BASE_URL": "https://api.deepseek.com",
"DEEPSEEK_MODEL": "deepseek-v4-pro"
}
}
}
}Any MCP-compatible Client
Configure stdio transport to point to node dist/index.js in the project directory, with the required environment variables set.
Testing
The project includes both interactive and automated test frameworks:
# Interactive CLI (with tools mode)
npm run test:with-tool
# Interactive CLI (pure thinking, no tools)
npm run test:without-tool
# Automated comparison test (runs both scenarios + generates report)
npm run test:comparison
# Batch end-to-end tests
npm run test:batchTest Scripts
Script | Description |
| Interactive CLI test framework |
| Automated A/B comparison (with-tool vs without-tool) |
| Scenario A: thinking model + tools (standalone, DeepSeek) |
| Scenario B: pure thinking model (standalone, DeepSeek) |
| Batch end-to-end tests |
Scoring: Each question is evaluated against 10 objective checkpoints (50 total). Evaluation is done by human reviewers, not automated scripts.
Note: The test/config.json file contains your API key and is automatically gitignored.
Project Structure
โโโ src/
โ โโโ index.ts # MCP Server entry point
โ โโโ chatAgentTool.ts # Tool implementations (chat_agent, create_branch, get_branch_details)
โ โโโ gatekeeper.ts # Input validation and quota enforcement
โ โโโ strategyEngine.ts # Parameter strategy mapping (call_type โ temperature/top_p)
โ โโโ nodeStore.ts # Branch node storage and conclusion extraction
โ โโโ schemas.ts # Zod validation schemas and TypeScript types
โ โโโ logger.ts # Structured logging to stderr
โ โโโ polyfill.ts # Node 14 fetch polyfill
โโโ test/
โ โโโ comparisonTest.ts # A/B comparison test
โ โโโ testFramework.ts # Interactive CLI test framework
โ โโโ batchTest.ts # Batch testing
โ โโโ runA.js # Scenario A test (DeepSeek)
โ โโโ runB.js # Scenario B test (DeepSeek)
โ โโโ config.json # API configuration (gitignored)
โโโ .env.example # Environment variable template
โโโ blueprint.md # Project design blueprint (Chinese)
โโโ package.json
โโโ tsconfig.json
โโโ README.mdDevelopment
# Build TypeScript
npm run build
# Start production server
npm run start
# Development mode (ts-node, no build step)
npm run devDesign Philosophy
Self-Contained Task Descriptions โ All context must be packed into
input_text; tools never rely on conversation historyContext Isolation โ Each tool call is stateless and independent, preventing context explosion in the main chain
Token Cost Optimization โ Context is consumed by the cheaper non-thinking model's input tokens, not the thinking model's output tokens
Tree-Structured Reasoning โ Complex problems are decomposed into independent branches, each analyzed separately, then synthesized
Benchmark: MCP Tools Impact on Output Quality
We conducted a controlled experiment comparing 3 approaches across 5 challenging engineering problems (distributed consensus, service mesh, RTOS kernel, columnar storage engine, multi-modal AI agent framework).
Test Groups
Group | Model | API | Tools |
A | GLM-5.2 | SiliconFlow | None |
B | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | DeepSeek Official | chat_agent + create_branch |
C | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | DeepSeek Official | None |
Key Results
Metric | A (GLM-5.2) | B (DS + Tools) | C (DS Pure) |
Total Output | 38,888 chars | 169,484 chars ๐ | 57,565 chars |
Total Time | 705s | 1,516s | 239s ๐ |
Total Tokens | 28,459 | 210,482 | 29,184 |
Total Cost | ยฅ0.75 | ยฅ0.21 | ยฅ0.06 ๐ |
Avg Output/Question | 7,778 chars | 33,897 chars (4.4x) ๐ | 11,513 chars |
Tool Calls | 0 | 30 ๐ | 0 |
Cache Hit Rate | 0% | up to 68% ๐ | 0% |
What We Found
With MCP tools, DeepSeek-V4-Flash produced 4.4x more detailed engineering solutions โ including complete Go-style Raft consensus implementations, assembly-level RTOS scheduler code, and production-ready service mesh configurations
Tree-structured thinking (
create_branch) enabled the model to explore 5-6 levels deep on complex problems, creating subtrees for architecture, implementation, testing, and verificationCost comparison: GLM-5.2 costs 13x more than DeepSeek-V4-Flash pure thinking mode (ยฅ0.75 vs ยฅ0.06) for comparable output quality. With tools enabled, DeepSeek-V4-Flash cost increased to ยฅ0.21 due to deeper exploration (3.7x more tokens), but remained 3.6x cheaper than GLM-5.2.
Cache hit rates reached 68% during multi-round tool calls, dramatically reducing effective input costs via DeepSeek's prefix caching
Full experiment results and data:
results/comparison/report.md