alterios_replay_smoke

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It correctly indicates the tool is read-only and local, but lacks details on what 'replay smoke checks' entail, expected duration, permissions required, or output format. The term 'replay' hints at deterministic tests, but more transparency is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The single-sentence description is concise and front-loaded with the core action. However, it sacrifices completeness for brevity, omitting parameter details and behavioral specifics that could be added without significant bloat.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description does not explain return values or how the smoke check results are presented. With 4 configurable parameters and no documentation, the description is far from complete for a testing tool with multiple options.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no information about the four parameters (profile, project_id, include_live, expected_tool_count_min). The agent is left to infer parameter meanings from names alone, which is insufficient for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies a clear verb ('Run') and resource ('local/read-only MCP replay smoke checks') with context ('after an update'). It differentiates from siblings like alterios_profile_smoke_matrix by emphasizing read-only local smoke checks, though the exact meaning of 'MCP replay' could be clearer.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states the usage trigger ('after an update'), providing clear context. However, it does not mention when not to use this tool or suggest alternative tools for other scenarios, such as alterios_profile_smoke_matrix for different smoke check configurations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.