sonarr_create_indexer_testall

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the explicit warning 'WRITE: this modifies your Sonarr instance,' which aligns with readOnlyHint=false but does not disclose any additional behavioral traits such as side effects, permission requirements, or operational impact. It is minimally helpful but not contradictory.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief—two short sentences—and wastes no words. However, it is under-specified, which affects other dimensions; the conciseness itself is good.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a write operation that likely triggers testing of all indexers, the description fails to explain what 'testall' means, what the output represents, or any potential side effects. It is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's full behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, and the description does not need to explain any. Baseline for 0 params is 4, and the description neither adds nor detracts.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description restates the tool name ('Create indexer testall') without defining what 'testall' does or how it differs from sibling tools like sonarr_create_indexer_test. It provides no elaboration on the intended action, making it a tautology rather than a clear purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as sonarr_create_indexer_test or sonarr_list_indexer_schema. The description lacks any context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.