qbittorrent_torrents_resume

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations indicate this is a write operation (readOnlyHint=false) but not destructive. The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond the action itself; it doesn't disclose side effects like whether resuming already-active torrents is a no-op, whether it affects all torrents when 'all' is used, or if it fails on invalid hashes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that includes the core purpose and the critical parameter format. No filler or unnecessary words, making it highly concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and an output schema, the description covers the essential action and parameter format. However, it lacks usage context (e.g., when to resume torrents) and does not mention error behavior or what the response contains, though an output schema exists. It is adequately complete for a minimal operation but leaves some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only defines 'hashes' as a string with no description, so the description provides essential semantics: it can be a pipe-separated list of hashes or the literal 'all'. This fully compensates for the 0% schema coverage and makes the parameter unambiguous.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool resumes/starts torrents, which is a specific action on a specific resource. It also mentions the key parameter format, distinguishing it from other torrent operations like pause or delete.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, such as the torrent needing to be paused, or when 'all' might be appropriate. The sibling tool 'qbittorrent_torrents_pause' suggests a complementary action but is not referenced.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.