prowlarr_bulk_push_releases

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states the action itself (sending releases) but does not mention any consequences, failure modes, idempotency, or whether it targets all configured clients or a specific one. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the action, and every word earns its place. No fluff or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core purpose and parameter semantics, and the presence of an output schema lessens the need to describe return values. However, it lacks behavioral expectations, any mention of how download clients are selected ('configured' is ambiguous), and no integration with the sibling push_release. It is adequate but has clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only defines 'body' as an array of generic objects with additionalProperties true, giving zero semantic detail. The description adds meaningful meaning by stating that 'body is a list of ReleaseResource objects', clarifying the expected element type. While it doesn't detail the fields of ReleaseResource, it substantially improves the parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sends multiple releases to configured download clients at once. The verb 'send' is specific, and 'multiple releases' distinguishes it from the sibling tool prowlarr_push_release, making its bulk nature explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'at once' and 'multiple releases' implies this tool is for batch operations rather than single pushes, providing clear context for when to use it. However, it does not explicitly mention exclusions like 'for a single release use push_release', so it lacks explicit alternative guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.