Skip to main content
Glama
SavageCore

dashy-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to dashy-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing Dashbrr's REST API as tools, so an LLM can read and manage a dashbrr instance: configured services, per-service health, and summary panels for many apps. Write tools cover settings management, download-queue deletes, Overseerr approvals, UI preferences, and the Plex auth PIN flow.
      34
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing qbit_manage's Web API as tools, so an LLM can read and manage a qbit_manage instance: run maintenance commands on qBittorrent torrents, manage config files, scheduler, logs, security settings, and system state.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for full Home Assistant control, enabling AI agents to manage dashboards, automations, files, apps, entities, and more via REST API, WebSocket, and SSH.
      66
      86 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for OpenHAB v5+ that exposes the entire REST API as tools for AI models, enabling complete control over items, things, rules, persistence, and semantic model.
      25
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A thin MCP server that securely enables AI agents to interact with Home Assistant, Mealie, and Nirvana via tools for automation, recipe management, and task tracking, while keeping credentials hidden.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four tools target distinct levels of the Dashy config hierarchy (config file, top-level keys, sections, items). While there is some overlap—e.g., dashy_key can get/set the 'sections' key—the intended granularity is clear. A minor ambiguity exists because key operations could be used to access sections/items, but the descriptions guide toward the resource-specific tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names follow a consistent dashy_<noun> pattern (config, key, section, item), which is predictable. The operation names embedded within each tool also use consistent verb_noun snake_case (e.g., get_config, add_section, delete_item). The only deviation is that the tool names are nouns rather than verbs, but this is uniform across the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is slightly few for a config management server, but each tool is a dispatcher covering multiple related operations, so the effective scope is broader. This keeps the tool count within a reasonable range and avoids overwhelming the agent with 18 separate tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the primary lifecycle for config management: reading/replacing full configs, getting/setting top-level keys, and CRUD for sections and items. Notable missing operations include a list_sections function, but sections can be retrieved via get_config or get_key, and the rest of the surface is functional.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues