dashbrr_get_autobrr_releases

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds context about the return payload (data array, count, next_cursor) and the required type-prefixed format for instance_id. Since readOnlyHint is already set, this supplemental information is valuable without contradicting the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no filler. The output shape is front-loaded, and the parameter note is immediately actionable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While brief, the description covers what the tool returns and the key input constraint. With an output schema and read-only annotation present, it is sufficient for a simple retrieval tool, though details like the time window for 'recent' are not disclosed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides a bare string parameter with no description (0% coverage), but the description compensates by specifying the required format with an example ('autobrr-0'). It doesn't explain the semantic meaning of instance_id itself, but for a single-parameter tool this is adequate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the resource as 'Recent autobrr releases' and implies a retrieval operation, distinguishing it from sibling tools like autobrr_irc and autobrr_stats. However, it lacks an explicit verb such as 'gets' or 'lists', relying on the tool name to convey the action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like dashbrr_get_autobrr_stats or dashbrr_get_autobrr_irc. The description only states the output shape and a parameter constraint, so the agent cannot differentiate use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.