Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
render_diagramA

Render an ASCII/Unicode box diagram as SVG (or a web page), keeping every character in its exact cell. Writes output_path and returns a JSON report: read 'status' (ok | warnings | self_check_failed | bad_input) and 'summary'. For warnings, apply each 'hint' (it names the row/col to fix) and render again. Pick 'preset' from where the diagram is going. Run check_diagram first on a new diagram.

check_diagramA

Validate an ASCII/Unicode box diagram without writing anything. Returns 'status', 'summary', warnings with concrete 'hint's (e.g. 'the arrowhead v at row 5 col 5 is one column right'), and the structure: boxes and edges (which box each arrow connects). Use it to confirm a diagram means what you intended before rendering.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct role: one validates the diagram structure and meaning, the other renders it to SVG. The descriptions are explicit about when to use each, and render_diagram even instructs running check_diagram first, eliminating ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: check_diagram and render_diagram. The verb clearly conveys the action while the shared noun signals the common domain.

Tool Count3/5

With only two tools, the server feels minimal, but for a focused ascii-to-svg conversion task the validate-then-render workflow is reasonable. It is borderline thin rather than excessively small.

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers the full intended workflow: optionally validate a diagram, then render it to SVG or a web page. It provides feedback and hints for fixing issues, so there are no obvious dead ends for the stated purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues