get_user
Retrieve details of a specific team user in App Store Connect by providing their user resource ID.
Instructions
Get details of a specific team user.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | The user resource ID |
Retrieve details of a specific team user in App Store Connect by providing their user resource ID.
Get details of a specific team user.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | The user resource ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must fully convey behavior. It only states 'Get details' but does not mention permissions, rate limits, or what details are returned. It is minimally adequate but lacks depth.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single efficient sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the absence of an output schema, the description should hint at the returned data structure. It does not, leaving the agent without expectation of the response format. For a simple GET, this is minimally sufficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema covers the single parameter with a description ('The user resource ID'), so the description adds no new meaning. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'details of a specific team user', distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_users that return multiple users. It precisely communicates the tool's function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as list_users. Without context, the agent may not know the appropriate use case.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SardorbekR/appstore-connect-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server