get_context_for_action

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations, so description should disclose behaviors. It mentions return content but not safety, side effects, or permissions. Lacks transparency for a read-like operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single concise sentence with front-loaded purpose and comprehensive list of returned items. No redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, description explains the return bundle well (constraints, decisions, bugs, etc.). Sufficient for understanding the tool's output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, yet description only vaguely connects 'file' and 'editing' to parameters. Does not clarify file_path or action_type beyond obvious enumeration.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it provides a 'pre-action context bundle' for a file before editing, listing specific components. Distinct from sibling tools that focus on individual aspects.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage before editing, but no explicit guidance on when to use alternatives like get_constraints or get_related_bugs for specific needs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.