Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to etch

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Tamper-evident audit trail for AI agent tool calls. Cryptographically signed, hash-chained records that prove what your agents did.
      3
      18 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to sign action records locally, publish them to a public log, and retrieve tamper-evident proofs that anyone can verify offline.
      44 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Verifiable action receipts for AI agents — agents sign claims locally, an independent witness countersigns and timestamps, anyone can verify offline.
      7 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Superseded. Earlier version of the DCL product (MCP endpoint at /sse with API key, plus an offline desktop audit trail). Not the current path for agents. Use the hosted DCL Trust Oracle: https://github.com/Fronesis-Labs/dcl-webhook (MCP endpoint https://mcp.fronesislabs.com/mcp, Streamable HTTP, x402 payment, no API key).
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to sign decisions with post-quantum cryptographic proofs and maintain secure audit trails for compliance. It provides tools for stamping events, verifying chain integrity, and exporting audit data across industries like finance and healthcare.
      4
      25 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., query_fact vs. search_global, record_decision vs. record_correction). A few pairs like get_constraints/get_agents_md_constraints and simulate_change/validate_change have some overlap, but the descriptions differentiate them sufficiently for an agent to choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (get_*, record_*, predict_*, etc.). Even compound names like get_co_edit_suggestions and prove_entry_inclusion maintain the pattern without mixing conventions.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 31 tools, the surface is significantly larger than the typical well-scoped server. While the server covers a broad domain, this count places a heavy burden on agent selection and navigation, likely reducing overall coherence.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a comprehensive lifecycle: seeding, ingestion, querying, validation, prediction, audit, and export. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit update/delete for facts or constraints, but these are likely handled internally, so core workflows are supported without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues