Skip to main content
Glama
SantosRojas

Gmail Secure MCP

by SantosRojas

Related Servers

Alternatives to Gmail Secure MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Gmail operations such as reading, sending, searching, and managing emails, threads, labels, and drafts via MCP tools.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI assistants to securely search multiple mailboxes, reconstruct email threads, and inspect attachments through read-only tools without altering mailbox state.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching, reading, sending, drafting, and organizing emails across multiple Google accounts via MCP.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an MCP client to read, draft, organize, send, and delete email across multiple Gmail and Exchange Online/Outlook.com accounts, with per-account capability policies, recipient allowlists, confirmations, minimum OAuth scopes, and local audit logging.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Gmail operations like listing, searching, sending emails, and managing labels via MCP tools.
      22 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to browse folders, list and search messages, read emails, and retrieve selected attachments through a private read-only MCP bridge with OAuth and safe HTML extraction.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 43 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tool set is large, but descriptions draw clear lines between read/search tools, draft composition tools, send tools, label/filter management, and audit/watch operations. A few boundaries still require care, such as gmail_search_messages vs. gmail_list_threads vs. gmail_semantic_search, and gmail_get_message_details vs. gmail_get_thread_summary, but the descriptions generally prevent misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a predictable gmail_verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with clear action names like gmail_create_draft, gmail_apply_labels, and gmail_batch_trash. The main deviations are drive_get_doc_text, contacts_search, and contacts_get, which omit the gmail_ prefix but remain readable and consistent in style.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 43 tools, the surface is very heavy for a Gmail MCP server, spanning mail, drafts, labels, filters, watch, templates, semantic search, contacts, Drive docs, and audit. While many tools are individually useful, this is well beyond the 3–15 well-scoped range and risks overwhelming an agent choosing among closely related operations.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers a broad Gmail lifecycle: search/read, drafts, sending, trash/restore, labels, filters, spam, attachments, export, templates, watch, audit, contacts, and Drive document reading. Minor gaps remain, such as no label creation/deletion or filter update operation, but core workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues