Skip to main content
Glama
SannketNikam

Demo MCP Server

by SannketNikam
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Demo MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • expense-mcp

      mayankchugh-learning
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal FastMCP server providing demo tools for arithmetic operations and dice rolls, designed for learning MCP wiring with Claude Desktop or other MCP clients.
      3
      MIT

    • Fast MCP Local

      karthik78180
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal FastMCP server implementation that provides basic mathematical and greeting tools. Enables users to perform simple operations like adding numbers and greeting people by name through a lightweight MCP interface.
      MIT

    • Simple FastMCP Server

      zongjieshen
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal demonstration MCP server that provides basic mathematical addition and greeting functionality, serving as a template for building and deploying FastMCP servers.
      -

    • Calculator MCP Server

      surajkumar0203
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple MCP server that provides basic calculator functionality for performing mathematical operations. Built with FastMCP and demonstrates fundamental MCP server implementation patterns.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: add_expense creates new entries, list_expenses retrieves entries with filtering, and summarize provides aggregated analysis. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (add_expense, list_expenses, summarize), with 'summarize' being a verb-only form that still fits the action-oriented naming style. The naming is predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 3 tools, this server is well-scoped for expense management, covering core operations: creation, retrieval, and summarization. Each tool earns its place without feeling thin or excessive for the domain.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover basic expense tracking (create, list, summarize), but there are notable gaps in lifecycle coverage, such as updating or deleting expenses. This could limit agents in handling modifications or corrections, though core workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources