Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
infra-guard

infra-guard

by SanjanaJanardhan
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to infra-guard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • DevOps & Cloud Code Auditor

      Ansarii
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to run static analysis on GitHub repositories, raw code snippets, or local directories to detect cloud cost leaks in Terraform/AWS configs, PostgreSQL migration table-lock hazards, and OWASP/Next.js API security gaps. Each finding returns structured severity, line-level detail, and drop-in fixes.
      MIT

    • sovereign

      kraken222
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local-first scanning of Terraform for security misconfigurations while an AI assistant writes the code, providing fixes and compliance mappings without uploading infrastructure code.
      8
      7
      Apache 2.0

    • Publish Control

      EthYusuf
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to run pre-publish security and code-quality scans across 17 categories, generate a 0–100 security score and Markdown report, quickly check critical vulnerabilities, and receive fix/refactor suggestions by finding ID.
      3
      MIT

    • iac-guard-mcp

      suhail39ahmed
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to review Terraform/Bicep infrastructure diffs against Checkov or builtin regex policies, returning structured findings for Azure security issues.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are cleanly separated by file type: one handles Terraform files and the other handles Dockerfiles. There is no functional overlap or realistic risk of selecting the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same scan_<format>_file pattern, and the descriptions mirror each other for symmetry. Naming is predictable and internally consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is a thin set: they cover exactly Terraform and Dockerfile scanning, but the server named infra-guard feels narrow. The count is coherent but borderline for the apparent purpose.

    Completeness3/5

    For the supported file types, the scanning workflow is functional, but common IaC targets such as Kubernetes manifests or CloudFormation templates are absent. There is also no batch or exception-handling capability, leaving notable coverage gaps.

    Resources