tru8-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to tru8-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA universal data intelligence MCP server that enables AI agents to search, extract, structure, and analyze information from supported web sources. Provides machine-readable results for research, data processing, and automated workflows through a simple, reusable interface.154 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for grounded, cited AI: answers questions from live web sources, verifies claims, fact-checks documents, searches and reads URLs, summarises, classifies, and extracts fields, with usage tracking and status.59 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server wrapping the Ribcage Verification & Research Desk API: claim validation with receipts, scoped research, token screening, settlement verification, and editing tools for AI agents.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for local, source-agnostic research, turning briefs into platform-specific searches and cited evidence dossiers with PostgreSQL storage and optional browser capture.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that gives AI agents the web as compact, ranked, verified evidence — no API keys, no cloud retrieval, all models local.35 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables autonomous multi-perspective deep research, evidence harvesting, and verified report synthesis with confidence scoring, directly from MCP-compatible clients.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools have distinct purposes: check submits a claim, get_result returns analytics, and get_result_raw returns raw data. The two retrieval tools are very similar but explicitly differentiated by descriptions, causing minimal ambiguity.
All tools follow the pattern tru8_<verb>_<modifier> with consistent snake_case. The verbs 'check' and 'get' are clear, and modifiers 'result' and 'result_raw' are descriptive and uniformly applied.
Three tools is well-suited for the narrow domain of fact-checking: one for submitting a claim and two for retrieving results in different formats. No unnecessary tools, and the count is sufficient for the core workflow.
The tool surface covers the primary workflow (submit and retrieve results with or without analytics). However, there is no tool to list or manage previous checks, which is a minor gap for users who need to track multiple checks.