Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to tru8-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A universal data intelligence MCP server that enables AI agents to search, extract, structure, and analyze information from supported web sources. Provides machine-readable results for research, data processing, and automated workflows through a simple, reusable interface.
      154 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for grounded, cited AI: answers questions from live web sources, verifies claims, fact-checks documents, searches and reads URLs, summarises, classifies, and extracts fields, with usage tracking and status.
      59 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server wrapping the Ribcage Verification & Research Desk API: claim validation with receipts, scoped research, token screening, settlement verification, and editing tools for AI agents.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for local, source-agnostic research, turning briefs into platform-specific searches and cited evidence dossiers with PostgreSQL storage and optional browser capture.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three tools have distinct purposes: check submits a claim, get_result returns analytics, and get_result_raw returns raw data. The two retrieval tools are very similar but explicitly differentiated by descriptions, causing minimal ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the pattern tru8_<verb>_<modifier> with consistent snake_case. The verbs 'check' and 'get' are clear, and modifiers 'result' and 'result_raw' are descriptive and uniformly applied.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-suited for the narrow domain of fact-checking: one for submitting a claim and two for retrieving results in different formats. No unnecessary tools, and the count is sufficient for the core workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the primary workflow (submit and retrieve results with or without analytics). However, there is no tool to list or manage previous checks, which is a minor gap for users who need to track multiple checks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessOutdated data