Skip to main content
Glama
SalAkBuK

github-stars-mcp

by SalAkBuK
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to github-stars-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • star-knowledge-base

      fxbin
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve information from your GitHub starred repositories via semantic matching, turning your stars into a searchable personal code toolbox.
      1
      -

    • braindump

      mmkumar5401
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to persist and retrieve notes, code entities, and typed links in a local graph database across sessions, with hybrid offline search, graph traversal, and staleness checks. It also supports export/import and CLI access for backup and transfer.
      MIT

    • MCP Toolkit Pro

      DzAchref
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with GitHub (search repos, read files, issues, PRs), analyze code for quality and issues, and manage tasks with priority sorting.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear, distinct responsibilities, especially the orchestration pipeline steps. However, list_starred and batch_get_starred_with_readme overlap significantly in retrieving starred repos, and get_readme also overlaps with the batch tool's README fetching, creating potential confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent github_verb_noun pattern in snake_case. Even longer names like batch_get_starred_with_readme and assign_repo_to_lists fit the convention, making the set highly predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 17 tools, the set is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range but each tool serves a defined purpose—the orchestration group alone accounts for 5. The count feels heavy but not bloated for the breadth of features offered.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers star retrieval, README reading, list management, catalog export, health auditing, and search. Notable gaps include no way to remove a star/unstar, no delete or rename for user lists, and list membership only being add/update without explicit removal functionality.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources