clear_logcat

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations to describe behavioral traits, and the description itself does not disclose side effects, irreversibility, or whether the operation affects all devices or only one. 'Clear' implies destruction but lacks details on scope or consequences, leaving the agent unaware of potential impacts.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no redundant or extraneous information. It directly states the action and object, achieving maximum clarity in minimal words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool that clears a device buffer, the description is too sparse. It does not explain what happens when multiple devices are connected and no serial is provided, nor does it clarify whether the operation is reversible. The schema helps with parameter details but the overall context remains incomplete for an agent to make fully informed decisions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides a clear description for the single 'serial' parameter, so schema coverage is high. The tool description itself adds no parameter detail, but the baseline of 3 applies because the schema already documents the parameter meaning adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (clear) and the target (logcat buffer). It is unambiguous and directly conveys the tool's purpose. No confusion with other tools is possible given the specific object.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool, when not to use it, or how it relates to alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisites like device selection or side effects. The agent is left with no direction beyond the bare action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.