Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Plumbline

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for Sui blockchain analytics with 44 tools covering wallets, DeFi, NFTs, token prices, transactions, fund tracing, pools, staking, Move decompilation, and MVR name resolution.
      19
      803 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying historical and real-time crypto market data across Hyperliquid, Hyperliquid HIP-3, and Lighter.xyz - orderbooks, trades, candles, funding, open interest, liquidations, and data quality metrics.
      100
      64 npm
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for querying Hyperliquid perp markets, funding rates, order books, candles, and account positions/fills/funding for any address, without needing API keys or wallets.
      8
      28 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for Hyperliquid that provides public market data (prices, order books, funding) and any wallet's positions, orders, and fills via MCP tools, without requiring a private key.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides structured access to Aster DEX market data—covering candlesticks, order books, trades, and funding rates.
      11
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most market-data tools target distinct queries (book, candles, recent trades, fees, indexer health), but the stats cluster overlaps heavily: get_volume, get_pool_stats, and get_swing_range all return price ranges, volume, and volatility over similar windows, and get_recent_trades vs get_bm_fills both return fills with only a filter difference. An agent can pick reasonably from the descriptions, but it must read carefully to avoid redundant or wrong-stat calls.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all 16 names follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_*, list_*, estimate_*, create_*), which is predictable and readable. Minor deviations are the abbreviations 'bm' and 'ohlcv' and the use of 'check_template_order' where 'get_' is the house style.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is at the upper edge but each one maps to a concrete endpoint with a stated output; none looks redundant enough to cut outright. The caveat is that the surface spans two unrelated domains (DeepBook market data and a template store), which inflates the count relative to either purpose alone.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-only market-data side is thorough: pools, params, book, fills, OHLCV, volume, volatility, fees, and indexer health are all covered, and the store flow has list/create/check. Gaps are minor — no slippage/depth-cost estimation beyond fee quotes, no way to list a client's own past orders without an order id, and no cross-pool comparison tool beyond the top-volume default.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues