Skip to main content
Glama
Sai-Adarsh

Coyote MCP Server

by Sai-Adarsh

Related Servers

Alternatives to Coyote MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A robust MCP server with tools to search, install, configure, repair, and uninstall MCP servers, automating setup and maintenance across multiple AI and developer tools.
      4
      17
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a complete end-to-end MCP server implementation with file system tools, web scraping capabilities, and system information access. Includes ready-to-use configuration files and integration examples for Claude Desktop, ChatGPT, and other AI models.
      6
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A universal AI assistant MCP server that transforms Claude into a multi-talented development assistant with intelligent mode selection, conversation continuity, and smart file handling. Automatically adapts to different tasks like debugging, code analysis, planning, and testing while supporting multiple AI providers and maintaining context across conversations.
      11
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A personal MCP server for AI assistant integration that provides custom tools, resources, and prompts for use with Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that equips AI assistants with specialized, opinionated development playbooks for building microservices, frontends, databases, and DevOps pipelines. It integrates with clients like VS Code Copilot, Claude Desktop, and Cursor to provide battle-tested expertise.
      74 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools, as there are no other tools to compare it to. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Since there is only a single tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect; there are no other tool names to compare it against, so no inconsistencies can arise.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is generally too few for most server purposes, as it limits functionality and suggests a very narrow scope. While it might be appropriate for a minimal utility, it often feels thin and incomplete for broader use cases.

    Completeness1/5

    The server's domain appears to be AppleScript execution on macOS, but with only one tool, there are significant gaps; for example, there are no tools for validating scripts, handling errors, or managing script files, making the surface severely incomplete for typical workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues