No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool targets a distinct audit surface: privacy policy text, cookie consent markup, web forms, local project files, breach documentation, third-party domains, plus aggregation/reporting/checklist tools. The only mild overlap is run_full_audit versus the individual scan tools, but that granular-vs-aggregate split is a standard and understandable pattern.
All nine tools follow a strict snake_case verb_noun pattern (scan_*, detect_*, find_*, check_*, run_*, generate_*, list_*). Verb variation is semantically meaningful rather than arbitrary, so the naming stays predictable.
Nine tools is well within the ideal range and each earns its place: six specific audit checks, one orchestrator, one report generator, and one reference/checklist tool. Nothing feels padded or missing at the count level.
The surface covers the full audit lifecycle from individual checks through full audit to gap reporting, plus a checklist reference. Minor gaps remain: no tool to retrieve or persist prior audit results, no remediation/fix guidance beyond the gap report, and no explicit data subject request workflow check.