Skip to main content
Glama
SPFreedom

jef-mcp

by SPFreedom
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to jef-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • jev-flash-router

      Ravinder82
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to make fast, zero-output-token decisions by evaluating context, diffs, logs, or options through the OpenRouter Decisions API using TypeSafe Jev, returning calibrated probabilities for binary, categorical, or scoring questions.
      1
      136 npm
      2
      MIT

    • askjev

      pZacca
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to get fast, calibrated probabilistic answers from Jev (Typesafe AI) to yes/no, scale, or choice questions about provided material, without using a generative model.
      1
      MIT

    • daf-jev

      docxology
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language interaction with TypeSafe's Jev decision API, supporting mixed question calls, batch evaluation, model listing, and confidence or composite-score gates over stdio.
      6
      MIT

    • Jev MCP

      chungsubeen0
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables frontier coding agents to delegate routine probabilistic judgments to TypeSafe Jev, providing calibrated triage signals for failures, attempts, completion, context ranking, findings, risk, and generic evidence-grounded questions.
      7
      MIT

    • the-committee

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that wraps the StupidAPIs' 'The Committee' tool, which convenes five random number generators to argue and vote with one always dissenting.
      4 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool produces a distinctly different output type: binary yes/no, a single pick with probabilities, a numeric score, an ordering, and a categorical flag. The descriptions explicitly map use cases to each response shape, so an agent should not confuse them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names share the jef_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case, which is consistent. The only slight deviation is jef_yes_no being named after its output while the others are verb-like commands (pick, score, rank, flag), but this is a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped size for a subjective-decision helper server. Each tool covers a different way a user might want an opinion, and none feel redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the main decision output types an agent would need: binary choices, selection among options, numerical ratings, ordering, and categorical verdicts. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose.

    Resources