jef-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to jef-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables local, LLM-free probabilistic decisions (choice, classification, scoring, yes/no) with real probabilities in 100+ languages, as a drop-in replacement for jev-local tools.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes eleven typed decision tools—check, choose, score, judge, route, triage, guard, grep, rank, compact, and ask—so agents can make fast, branchable yes/no, option-pick, score, and filtering decisions on text via TypeSafe's Jev model.12 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes three tools over MCP stdio that answer typed questions — yes/no, choice, and score — with calibrated probabilities instead of prose. Runs entirely offline by default, names every transmission before it happens, and only reaches a live Jev provider when credentials and provider settings are supplied.66 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceJudgment calls on small, fast, cheap models: yes/no, pick-one and rating questions about any text, answered YES, NO or UNSURE. Four tools (likely, classify, rate, each) for TypeSafe's Jev, open models on Ollaya, Ollama or a local NLI model.47Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to offload yes/no, multiple-choice, and scoring questions to TypeSafe's Jev, returning compact confidence-scored answers to save tokens and improve speed.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to make fast, zero-output-token decisions by evaluating context, diffs, logs, or options through the OpenRouter Decisions API using TypeSafe Jev, returning calibrated probabilities for binary, categorical, or scoring questions.128 npm3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool produces a distinctly different output type: binary yes/no, a single pick with probabilities, a numeric score, an ordering, and a categorical flag. The descriptions explicitly map use cases to each response shape, so an agent should not confuse them.
All names share the jef_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case, which is consistent. The only slight deviation is jef_yes_no being named after its output while the others are verb-like commands (pick, score, rank, flag), but this is a minor inconsistency.
Five tools is a well-scoped size for a subjective-decision helper server. Each tool covers a different way a user might want an opinion, and none feel redundant or unnecessary.
The tool surface covers the main decision output types an agent would need: binary choices, selection among options, numerical ratings, ordering, and categorical verdicts. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose.