Skip to main content
Glama
SPARKIT-science

mcp-sparkit

Official
by SPARKIT-science
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-sparkit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • scholar-memory

      byBasiliosP
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables scientific literature research through multi-agent search, analysis, and semantic memory, exposing 9 MCP tools for querying, storing, and retrieving research findings.
      1
      MIT

    • PaperPilot

      sharadvc
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and retrieve academic papers from arXiv and PubMed with citation-grade extraction, providing clean citations and summaries.
      -

    • omnisearch-mcp

      All3yp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to search academic literature across multiple sources (IEEE, arXiv, ACM, Semantic Scholar, CORE, Scite, Consensus) and index/search local PDFs.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: 'research' submits a scientific question and returns either a report or a job ID, while 'get_job_status' retrieves the status or result of a previously submitted job. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tool names use snake_case, but 'research' is a single-word noun while 'get_job_status' follows a verb_noun pattern. This minor inconsistency prevents a perfect score.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only two tools, the server covers the essential workflow of submitting a research job and checking its status. While minimal, the count is appropriate for the narrow scope of a scientific research agent.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers the primary use case (submit and retrieve results), but lacks features like job listing, cancellation, or retry. For a simple agent this may suffice, but there are notable gaps in lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources