A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceAn MCP server implementation that enables interaction with the Letta API for managing agents, memory blocks, and tools in the Letta system.
36
113 npm
79
MIT
Letta MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Letta MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables any AI agent to connect to any OpenAI-compatible LLM provider through a unified MCP interface, with automatic failover, caching, cost tracking, and multi-model consensus.13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Zed) to llmsproxy.ai, exposing chat, coding, and retrieval capabilities as MCP tools, resources, and prompts.7 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables connecting AI assistants to iMessage, WhatsApp, and A2A agents through a single MCP server.325 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnect any AI client to the CaBrain memory system via MCP, exposing tools for memory recall, retain, and brain management.2 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceConnects your personal Althea AI assistant to MCP-compatible tools like Codex and Claude, allowing you to send messages and retrieve conversation history.MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 18 tools
Disambiguation5/5
All 18 tools have distinct purposes, covering agent lifecycle, memory, tools, and conversation management. No overlap or ambiguity.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow the 'letta_verb_noun' pattern, with clear verbs (create, delete, get, list, update, attach, detach, send, export, search) and nouns (agent, memory, tool, conversation).
Tool Count4/5
18 tools is slightly above the ideal range (3-15) but well-justified by the breadth of functionality (agents, memory, tools, conversations, health, usage stats). The count is appropriate for a full agent server.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers core operations: CRUD for agents, memory management, tool attachment, conversation interaction, health check, and usage stats. Minor gaps like deleting memory blocks or archiving agents exist but do not hinder typical workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues