Skip to main content
Glama
SLdragon

MCP User Profile Management Server

by SLdragon

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP User Profile Management Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to prompt users for input directly within the chat UI using MCP's elicitation capabilities, allowing for interactive multi-turn conversations without leaving the conversation interface.
      1
      15 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables user creation and retrieval through MCP tools, resources, and prompts, with Google Gemini integration for natural language interaction.
      1,599 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables management of user health profiles with capabilities to list, retrieve, and add user health information. Provides a sample implementation for testing MCP functionality with ChatGPT and other MCP-compatible tools.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables management of system users through a simple sample API, exposed as MCP tools for natural-language interaction.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Demonstrates elicitations for collecting structured user input interactively across tools, resources, and prompts in the Model Context Protocol.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server demonstrating Streamable HTTP with Tools, Resources, and Prompts for user registration, login, and profile management via a REST API.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. The tools are cleanly divided between user profile operations (create_user_profile, list_users, search_users) and job posting operations (create_job_details, list_jobs), with no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern throughout. The verbs (create, list, search) are consistently applied to their respective nouns (user_profile, users, job_details, jobs), creating a predictable and readable naming convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    Five tools is reasonable for a user profile management server, though it feels slightly thin. The server covers basic CRUD operations for two resource types (users and jobs), but lacks update and delete operations which would be expected in a complete management system.

    Completeness3/5

    There are notable gaps in the tool surface for a management server. While create and list operations exist for both users and jobs, there are no update or delete tools. Additionally, search exists only for users, not for jobs, creating an asymmetry in functionality.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues