houan-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to houan-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides tools and prompts for searching Japanese Diet (国会) proceedings using the National Diet Library API. Enables querying meetings and speeches with various filters and obtaining direct URLs to the records.338-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for searching the National Diet Library of Japan (NDL Search), enabling Japanese-script bibliographic and article searches with rate limiting and attribution.61MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the Korean National Assembly Open API, enabling querying of bills, members, votes, committees, and more via natural language.20Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server wrapping the e-Gov law API v2 to search and retrieve Japanese law data, including law lists, revision histories, full text, attachments, and keyword search.62MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for searching and retrieving Japanese laws from the e-Gov API, enabling natural language queries for legal information.36 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Japan's TDnet (Timely Disclosure network). Search and retrieve timely disclosure documents from listed companies on Japanese stock exchanges.389 PyPI5Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource: speeches (find_diet_qa), bills (get_bill, search_bills), and meeting transcripts (get_meeting_record). There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool.
Tool names mix verb prefixes: 'find', 'get', and 'search'. While all use snake_case, the lack of a uniform verb-noun pattern (e.g., all 'get_...' or all 'search_...') creates mild inconsistency.
Four tools is well-scoped for the domain of Japanese Diet information retrieval. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy or excessive granularity.
The tool set covers search and retrieval for bills, speeches, and meeting transcripts, which are the core needs. Minor gaps exist (e.g., listing all committees or filtering by date), but they don't hinder primary workflows.