A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceProvides a local, read-oriented MCP server for the MASA protocol, enabling offline validation, inspection, lineage tracing, public-export audit, and processing-request planning for sound-matter records.
MIT
SHAR Production Metadata MCP
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to SHAR Production Metadata MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for auditing DeepSeek Harness evidence. Enables inspection and verification of content-addressed audit manifests with fail-closed validation.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA stateless MCP server for composing, validating, auditing, and rendering consequential documents from a small semantic model.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLocal, read-only MCP server that provides verified access to bounded.tools' signed static API, including the Web-Build Conformance report and SPDX SBOM, with byte-for-byte verification against a Sigstore-signed manifest.14 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for sovereign US legal workflows, providing Ed25519-signed manifests and offline-capable access via your own infrastructure.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA deterministic, network-free MCP server for validating repository release hygiene and version alignment in local projects. It enables automated repository health checks and generates standardized release checklists based on project state.1-
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 1 tool
Disambiguation5/5
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. The tool's purpose is clearly defined in its description, leaving no ambiguity.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern: validate_production_manifest. There are no other tools to introduce inconsistency, so naming is perfectly coherent.
Tool Count3/5
A single tool feels thin for a server named 'Metadata MCP,' which could imply a broader scope. However, the tool's narrowly defined validation purpose means one tool may be reasonable, but it falls in the borderline range.
Completeness4/5
The tool covers the core validation functionality for production metadata, checking project metadata, stage, and rights status. However, the server name suggests a broader metadata management role, so additional operations like retrieval or update might be expected, creating a minor gap.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues