Lex: Luxembourg Law MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Lex: Luxembourg Law MCP Server
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceInstallable MCP server for EU legal research with verifiable CELEX citations from the EUR-Lex corpus (DE/EN/FR).21MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI-powered legal research across 4,551 Luxembourg statutes, 260 case law decisions, and EU law integrations through natural language queries and 13 specialized tools.45 npm2Apache 2.0

Legalizeofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search and read consolidated legislation from multiple countries, retrieve exact law texts as of any historical date with citations and git commit SHAs, and create webhook or email subscriptions to track legal changes.2MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables legal research by providing unified search across ~3.3 million court decisions (French and European) and ~1.5 million consolidated law articles, with tools for retrieving full texts and historical versions, all without authentication.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceCite-grade German legal-text infrastructure for LLM agents, providing access to federal, Länder, and EU laws with cryptographic provenance.44 PyPI2Apache 2.0

Moonlit Legal Researchofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceOfficial European law, expanding globally: 20M+ documents, 35+ jurisdictions, verifiable citations.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides structured access to EU treaties, regulations, directives, and CJEU case law via 14 tools for searching, retrieving, and analyzing legislation and court decisions.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct legal research need: provenance, state-at-date, document history, force status, diffing, search, provision history, coverage, citations, and corpus-wide changes. The descriptions clearly differentiate overlapping tools like timeline vs article_history and diff vs changes_in_period.
All tool names are lowercase and use underscores for multi-word phrases, following a consistent pattern. While parts of speech vary, the formatting style is uniform, with no camelCase or mixed conventions.
With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped for legal research, covering discovery, retrieval, temporal analysis, and citation tracking. Each tool serves a unique purpose without redundancy.
The tool surface is largely complete, offering search, document retrieval, history, diffing, force status, and citations. The only notable gap is the absence of a forward-citation tool (which laws a given law references), though this can be mitigated by reading the text via as_of.