Skip to main content
Glama
SECRET4422

GuardRail MCP v2.0 (Enterprise)

by SECRET4422
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to GuardRail MCP v2.0 (Enterprise)

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • guardrails-mcp-server

      ExpertVagabond
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent security guardrails. Provides input validation, prompt injection detection, PII redaction, output filtering, policy enforcement, rate limiting, and comprehensive audit logging.
      31 npm
      1
      MIT

    • depguard

      mopanc
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP security server for AI coding agents. 12 tools: pre-install guardian, vulnerability audit, supply-chain attack detection via static code analysis, and CycloneDX 1.6 SBOM generation. Zero runtime dependencies.
      14
      19 npm
      16
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-audit-server

      joepangallo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables security auditing for MCP configurations and AI agents, including prompt injection testing, data flow tracing, and security policy generation.
      30 npm
      MIT

    • AI Security Crew

      Srajangpt1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server for security reviews that injects security requirements before code generation, scans dependencies for CVEs, and verifies generated code without disrupting workflow.
      68
      MIT

    • DepGuard

      foudhilriahi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      DepGuard is an MCP server for real-time dependency safety checks, verifying packages against vulnerability databases, deprecation metadata, and a local cache.
      0
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct domain (cloud cost, code safety, container, infra, compliance, etc.), but some overlap exists between audit functions (e.g., audit_code_safety vs. audit_infra_security) which could cause confusion. Descriptions are clear enough to differentiate in most cases.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores (e.g., audit_cloud_cost, scan_repository). A few tools like 'full_pipeline' and 'enterprise_health' break the pattern but are still readable. Overall consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    23 tools is on the high side for a single server, but each serves a specific purpose in a comprehensive security scanning and management suite. The count feels justified given the breadth of functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers scanning, auditing, compliance, reporting, policy management, and admin tasks. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool to delete scan history or manage users beyond tenants), but core workflows are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources